| Subject: Re: "Moon" walks in perspective . . |
| From: "Robert J. Kolker" <bobkolker@attbi.com> |
| Date: 11/11/2003, 21:00 |
| Newsgroups: sci.space.history,sci.physics,uk.sci.astronomy,alt.conspiracy.area51,alt.sci.planetary |
Moon Walker wrote:
travel, say, just ten thousand miles above the Earth? No,
never. All they have are lame excuses. We know the truth.
Anyone who knows where the reflecting mirrors are on the moon and has a
laser powerful enough can see the reflections. How did the mirrors get
there?
And yes, you are right. Manned travel in open space is very hazardous to
the health of the crew. That is why manned missions have lasted days and
not months. If we put a human crew on the moon without the wherewithall
to build shelters against solar radiation PDQ, then it is a suicide
mission. Astrounauts have reported seeing bright flashes, even with the
eyes shut. That is the effect of cosmic rays, very high energy particles
impinging on the retina. How much of that can a human take before he get
cataracts of the eye?
In addition to radiation hazards, 0-g exposures of the long run will
turn human bone into something resembling brittle chalk, and muscles
will degenerate rapidly. Humans are biologically not fit for longterm
exposure to space and our current technology does not given them
adequate protection against the hazards. On top of that, being cooped up
in a small compartment with others can soon lead to emotional pain and
conflict. Talk about cabin fever!
On a long voyage, more than a few day's out from Earth, if anything goes
wrong and the means to fix it are not at hand in the vessel the crew is
toast either figuratively or literally. Consequently I really question
the wisdom of manned missions to Mars, which involves a three year round
trip. Given current technology, it is a thoroughly bad idea.
Bob Kolker