| Subject: Re: First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective |
| From: Brett Buck |
| Date: 10/02/2004, 04:53 |
| Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.conspiracy.area51,alt.sci.planetary,alt.terrorism.world-trade-center,sci.space.history |
Warhol wrote:
"Henry Spencer" <henry@spsystems.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
Hsu5Cv.uA@spsystems.net...
In article <c08r2l$sgm$1@sparta.btinternet.com>, alice <alice@xn.net>
wrote:
If proof is really needed 100%, and if it was true would it not be
possible to view the original footprint and american flag using a
powerful telescope from earth.
No. Fundamental physics limits the resolution of telescopes; no Earth
telescope is big enough to show you the flag. The very best telescope
complexes now being built might eventually be able to show you one or two
little fuzzy blobs in the right places to be the LM and the rover.
Besides, if you don't believe razor-sharp photographs taken with ordinary
cameras by people on the spot, why would you believe a fuzzy computer-
enhanced image taken with a telescope?
--
MOST launched 30 June; science observations running | Henry Spencer
since Oct; first surprises seen; papers pending. |
henry@spsystems.net
So you admit, No proof of Man On the Moon
Uh, twit, do try to keep up. There's abundant proof- that you chose
to ignore. Far better than taking a picture with an Earthbound
telescope, even if it DIDN'T violate the laws of physics to do so.
Brett