"Stu Gotz" <stu03@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:stu03-3217FF.12293017022004@news.verizon.net...

In article <NnlYb.9293$c3.1939@bignews3.bellsouth.net>,
 " George" <George@george.net> wrote:

"Stu Gotz" <stu03@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:stu03-7BB230.23512116022004@news.verizon.net...

In article <df9f2946430d12e907e482c397d37d0d@news.teranews.com>,
 Bogart <Bogart@NoSpam.net> wrote:

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:51:09 GMT, Stu Gotz <stu03@hotmail.com>

wrote:

A week before Apollo 11 was launched, NASA launched an unmanned
probe which was placed in lunar orbit.  It was explained that the

probe

was for the purpose of training the Mission Control folks.

The same probe could have easily been used to relay radio signals

from

the Apollo craft which was in low earth orbit.

And of course any up linked signals from the Apollo craft to your
little conspirator probe wasn't picked up by _any_ of the thousands

of

listening stations all over the earth?

You might want to also get a clue that any transmissions sent from

an

orbiting probe _will not_ resolve to the same location as would any
fixed transmission from the moon.

And Nixon's live phone call to Armstrong and Aldrin while they were

on

the moon?

http://space.about.com/library/video/blvidapollo11_onbclip17.htm

Don't you think, Stu, that the fUSSR would have LOVED to have

exposed

such a conspiracy?  Or were the Soviets stupid?

Since the signals were coming via the lunar probe the propagations

delays

would have been correct.

Keep searching.

Try again, Stu, and stop using idiotic half baked possibilities to

Oh you may be the idiot.  The unmanned probe was named Tetra, I

believe,

and it was very real.    Mission Control practiced on transmission

from

the probe in preparation for the Apollo 11 mission.  it's not a secret
-- NASA has admitted it.

So what?

The Soviets didn't blow the whistle because joint US-USSR cooperation

on

the
space program began long before the Apollo-Soyut mission.

And in case you haven't paid attention to recent history in the past

30

years, the US "loaned" the USSR millions of dollars which they needn't
have paid back.  In addition, the US bagan selling wheat and other

crops

to the Soviets beginning around the time of the Apollo missions, most

of

the credit going to Tricky Nixon.

Suffice to say, the Soviets had all sorts of incentives to keep the

lid

on the Apollo missions.

Well, that is certainly a lot of drivel.  Why would the Soviets keep

such a

thing secret when they were spending far more on their space program in
competition with us that they ever got at the time by any so-called
agriculturals trade deal?  Just hinting at a conspiracy would have been

a

huge public relations victory for them.  And as I recall, those crop

sales

didn't occur until the mid-70s, well after the Apollo program was

canceled.

The deals were struck during the Nixon administration.  All of the
Apollo laqndings also occured during the Nixon administration. The huge
non-repayable loans also occured during Nixon's term in office.

Ao what?  The Apollo program was started by Kennedy, and by and large
overseen by Johnson.

The Soviets were working cooperatively with the US on the space
ventures.

That is the dumbest suggestion I've ever heard from a Moon conspiracy dork.

There was no sense in blowing the whistle.  For that matter,
the Soviets had several space program disasters, all which were
monitored by the NSA.

The largest Soviet disasters weren't even known by most Soviets, much less
the U.S. auntil the fall of the Soviet Union, dork.

We never plastered them across the front page of
the New York Times now, did we??

-- Stu

Because we didn't know about them, dork.

Oh, and here is "irrefutable proof" that the Apollo landings didn't

occur:

http://www.moontruth.com/clips/moontruth.mpg

Bhwhahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!

So, did you like my little movie?