| Subject: Re: First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective |
| From: " George" <George@george.net> |
| Date: 17/02/2004, 22:44 |
| Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.conspiracy.area51,alt.sci.planetary,alt.terrorism.world-trade-center,sci.space.history |
"Bogart" <Bogart@NoSpam.net> wrote in message
news:70f66ef562b19b71b1a7153576fd81e7@news.teranews.com...
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:16:34 -0500, " George" <George@george.net>
wrote:
"Stu Gotz" <stu03@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:stu03-61C9BB.12314717022004@news.verizon.net...
In article <56183018260b674d513c68d6cf8b335c@news.teranews.com>,
Bogart <Bogart@NoSpan.net> wrote:
Looks like I get to dream you might have been up to the task of
discussing the issues using science, physics, etc.
I worked comm on 2 of the APollo missions. I tried to enlighten you.
But stay in the dark. WHo gives a shit?
-- Stu
Lying sack of shit! One of my best friends has worked at NASA for about
25
years and he's never heard of you.
Yep. He can't respond or refute the radio signal data and now he's a
lying poser.
Anyone with a ham radio could picl up the radio signals, and with three
separate transmitters, could determine that the exact location of the signal
was in fact, the moon! Many ham radio operators in fact ollaborated to do
that very thing.