On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 04:50:16 GMT, Stu Gotz <stu03@hotmail.com> wrote:

In article <df9f2946430d12e907e482c397d37d0d@news.teranews.com>,
Bogart <Bogart@NoSpam.net> wrote:

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:51:09 GMT, Stu Gotz <stu03@hotmail.com> wrote:

A week before Apollo 11 was launched, NASA launched an unmanned
probe which was placed in lunar orbit.  It was explained that the probe 
was for the purpose of training the Mission Control folks.

The same probe could have easily been used to relay radio signals from
the Apollo craft which was in low earth orbit. 

And of course any up linked signals from the Apollo craft to your
little conspirator probe wasn't picked up by _any_ of the thousands of
listening stations all over the earth?  

You might want to also get a clue that any transmissions sent from an
orbiting probe _will not_ resolve to the same location as would any
fixed transmission from the moon.  

And Nixon's live phone call to Armstrong and Aldrin while they were on
the moon?  

http://space.about.com/library/video/blvidapollo11_onbclip17.htm

Don't you think, Stu, that the fUSSR would have LOVED to have exposed
such a conspiracy?  Or were the Soviets stupid?

Since the signals were coming via the lunar probe the propagations delays 
would have been correct.

Keep searching.

Try again, Stu, and stop using idiotic half baked possibilities to

Oh you may be the idiot.  

Not as long as you keep writing paragraphs consisting of conspiracy
gibberish and OT comments about crop sales, and not one word
regarding the issue of the radio signals posed by myself and Andrew
Grey.   

The unmanned probe was named Tetra, I believe, 
and it was very real.    Mission Control practiced on transmission from 
the probe in preparation for the Apollo 11 mission.  it's not a secret 
-- NASA has admitted it.

The Soviets didn't blow the whistle because joint US-USSR cooperation on 
the space program began long before the Apollo-Soyut mission.

And in case you haven't paid attention to recent history in the past 30 
years, the US "loaned" the USSR millions of dollars which they needn't 
have paid back.  In addition, the US bagan selling wheat and other crops 
to the Soviets beginning around the time of the Apollo missions, most of 
the credit going to Tricky Nixon.

Suffice to say, the Soviets had all sorts of incentives to keep the lid 
on the Apollo missions.

Dream on pal.

Looks like I get to dream you might have been up to the task of
discussing the issues using science, physics, etc.      

-- Stu

refute known science.    

Stu


In article <2bd96ebc53ae0b0d2189e44d338a95cf@news.teranews.com>,
Bogart <Bogart@NoSpam.net> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 01:09:13 +0100, "Warhol" <molarh@hotmail.com>
wrote:

So you admit, No proof of Man On the Moon

Radio transmissions from the moon don't convience you?   How do you
suppose the US orchastrated and produced radio transmissions from the
moon which were intercepted by listening stations all over the globe,
including Soviet listening stations, and amateur radio operators?
Anyone with a radio and a stop watch could have figured out where the
radio signals were coming from.   In the 34 years since the first US
astronaut landed on the moon, don't you think the fUSSR would use this
easily verifyable solution to debunk the US moon landing story?  



----

The <Dave Whitmarsh@PunkAss.com> story makes the newswires.
Message ID:<ecde36e37fef592589a1ac1bebee8e4d@news.teranews.com>

" It all started with just a simple taste. "
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/dogtaste.jpg

----

The <Dave Whitmarsh@PunkAss.com> story makes the newswires.
Message ID:<ecde36e37fef592589a1ac1bebee8e4d@news.teranews.com>

" It all started with just a simple taste. "
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/dogtaste.jpg

----

The <Dave Whitmarsh@PunkAss.com> story makes the newswires.
Message ID:<ecde36e37fef592589a1ac1bebee8e4d@news.teranews.com>

" It all started with just a simple taste. "
http://www.geocities.com/libassbug/dogtaste.jpg