"Bogart" <Bogart@NoSpam.net> wrote in message
news:e0e9f94c9fb00642102dbda5152d7793@news.teranews.com...

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:44:04 -0500, " George" <George@george.net>
wrote:

"Bogart" <Bogart@NoSpam.net> wrote in message
news:70f66ef562b19b71b1a7153576fd81e7@news.teranews.com...

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:16:34 -0500, " George" <George@george.net>
wrote:

"Stu Gotz" <stu03@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:stu03-61C9BB.12314717022004@news.verizon.net...

In article <56183018260b674d513c68d6cf8b335c@news.teranews.com>,
 Bogart <Bogart@NoSpan.net> wrote:

Looks like I get to dream you might have been up to the task of
discussing the issues using science, physics, etc.

I worked comm on 2 of the APollo missions.  I tried to enlighten

you.

But stay in the dark.  WHo gives a shit?

-- Stu

Lying sack of shit!  One of my best friends has worked at NASA for

about

25

years and he's never heard of you.

Yep.  He can't respond or refute the radio signal data and now he's a
lying poser.

Anyone with a ham radio could picl up the radio signals, and with three
separate transmitters, could determine that the exact location of the

signal

was in fact, the moon!  Many ham radio operators in fact ollaborated to

do

that very thing.

You are absolutely correct, George.  It is why whenever I run across
one of these " the moon landings were faked "  conspiracy nuts, I
always challenge them to refute the radio signals/transmissions data.
To date, not one of the nutso's has been up to the task.  Heh, they
usually stalk away uttering something about questioning the legality
of my birth.  :)

They certainly are unable to produce verifiable data to back up anything
they allege.