Subject: Re: First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective
From: " George" <George@george.net>
Date: 18/02/2004, 03:20
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.conspiracy.area51,alt.sci.planetary,alt.terrorism.world-trade-center,sci.space.history

"Jay Windley" <webmaster@clavius.org> wrote in message
news:c0u88i$s25$1@terabinaries.xmission.com...

"Stu Gotz" <stu03@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:stu03-260D88.12232017022004@news.verizon.net...
| >
| > Good, then perhaps you can point a link to it.
|
| Couldn't find your ass in the dark with a map and a
| flashlight, huh??

Apparently neither can you.  Otherwise you'd have found this

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog?sc=1967-123B

which disputes your claims of the dates involved.  And I'm fully aware
that
Bart Sibrel simply declares that the satellite didn't crash as stated.  He
hasn't provided any proof of it, despite that several amateur
satellite-watchers were tracking it all the way down.



Oops.  I guess that just blows his pantywaste idea right to smithereens!
The dorkster can't be too happy about that one.