"MikeSoja" <msoja9@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:vt6970tlou6ln0mpacjb7b8cn9tmamr1ea@4ax.com...

On 7 Apr 2004 16:45:18 -0700, u2r2h@gmx.net (Jeanne Newton) posted:

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/FD08Aa01.html

9-11 AND THE SMOKING GUN
Part 2: A real smoking gun
By Pepe Escobar

Part 1: 'Independent' commission

<snip of rumors of smoking gun>

6) Why have no scientific experts examined the physical and
mathematical evidence that a Boeing 757 could not have possibly
"disappeared" without a trace after hitting the Pentagon? For the most
exhaustive and practically incontrovertible analysis available on the

Yeah, "practically" incontrovertible.  Is that like "almost"?

And here I thought that that nutcase theory was confined to
avant-garde beanyman Dick Eastman.

Let's see, if Barnum was right, and there's one born every day, how
many is that since September 11, 2001?

It's just incredible what some people will believe.

Mike Soja