| Subject: Re: 911 was inside-job (!) it's in Asia Times newspaper |
| From: "Thanos" <TH3215_nospam@rcn.net> |
| Date: 08/04/2004, 19:33 |
| Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.area51,soc.culture.jewish,alt.current-events.clinton.whitewater,us.politics.elections,talk.politics.libertarian |
"Conquistador" <pinkspider123@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Fc3dc.1144$A_4.764@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
"MikeSoja" <msoja9@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:vt6970tlou6ln0mpacjb7b8cn9tmamr1ea@4ax.com...
On 7 Apr 2004 16:45:18 -0700, u2r2h@gmx.net (Jeanne Newton) posted:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/FD08Aa01.html
9-11 AND THE SMOKING GUN
Part 2: A real smoking gun
By Pepe Escobar
Part 1: 'Independent' commission
<snip of rumors of smoking gun>
6) Why have no scientific experts examined the physical and
mathematical evidence that a Boeing 757 could not have possibly
"disappeared" without a trace after hitting the Pentagon? For the most
exhaustive and practically incontrovertible analysis available on the
Yeah, "practically" incontrovertible. Is that like "almost"?
And here I thought that that nutcase theory was confined to
avant-garde beanyman Dick Eastman.
Let's see, if Barnum was right, and there's one born every day, how
many is that since September 11, 2001?
Mike Soja
You are so smart! Now tell us that Jews did not murder JFK! And that Jack
Ruby was not a jewish sayanim!
They did not. What, you read Victor Ostrovsky's book and that's now that's
*the truth*, and the explanation for *all evil*?
Thanos