The comedy team of Penn & Teller have a show on Showtime called "Bullshit".
They ran an episode about conspiracy theories. It fit very nicely with the
theme of the show.

"Paul Richard" <paul_richard@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ioWdnTBCkZ2j217fRVn-sQ@comcast.com...

below:
<miso@sushi.com> wrote in message
news:1120033996.663388.171840@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

You still can't claim it was a controlled demolition. Theories need
evidence to back them up. The steel burnt from the jet fuel.

"The steel burnt from the jet fuel?"  Amazing.

The planes

were chosen for cross country non-stop flights so that they would have
the maximum amount of fuel. The buildings themselve should have been
able to withstand the impact, but would not hold up due to the fire.
Check out this article:
http://www.graduatingengineer.com/articles/feature/01-11-02a.html
"Exponent" is the current name of the Failure Analysis Group, who are
experts in such matters.

There is a limit to the temperature that can be reached with what is
essentially kerosene-based fuel, not matter how much of it is present.

You do know that Atta was an architect in more ways than one. If you
read the 911 report, Osama considered these guys the A team. They were
not out of a refugee camp, but rather college educated in Europe. Atta
et all replaced the original team of evil doers.

Ooh, then they really were able to pull off the feats attributed to them.
And while you're at it, read the Warren Commission report and find out

what

an excellent marksman Oswald was.

BTW, your IQ as perceived by most in these newsgroups is diminished by 25%
by parroting W's phrase "evil doers."

Do you know for a fact that this company did security for the WTC? The
source of that story is "Prince George's Jornal." Seriously, I hate the
fucking bastard, but I just don't see any evidence that this was
planned. I see plenty of evidence the situation was contained poorly,
or even handled in a manner to cause more damage than would have
happened had Gore (our A team) been in charge. Who the hell takes a
month vacaction to shovel manure in Texas when you are getting
briefings indicating UBL is going to attack. You only act in such a
manner if you think an attack is imminent. Even after his vacation,
Shrub was fucking off in Florida rather than returning to DC.
Bush/Chenney have plenty of blood on their hands, but the logistics of
planning such an attact is really beyond them.

I don't claim they planned the logistics.  I merely ask you to explain how
Silverstein knew WTC-7 was "pullable" within hours of collapse of Towers.
He states on videotape that he gave order to "pull" and they watched the
building come down.  Now you can either claim that WTC-7 was constructed
with demolition built in, or you must conclude that the building was

rigged

prior to 9-11.

While we're at it, why do you think the SS allowed W to remain at the

school

for so long with "America under attack," which was a well-publicized

agenda

location?  Why didn't they whisk him off super fast?   If that's too hard,
then think of possible reasons they knew they and he would be safe by not
moving.

Then there is the case of the plane that crashed in Pa. That plane was
meant for the Capital. Since you believe this was all a set up, does
that mean there are/were charges in the capital building that were not
set off because the plane didn't hit the target?

You really are a dim bulb.  Why not ask why the Pentagon wasn't rigged?
Answer is that merely damaging the Pentagon or White House or Capital

would

be traumatic enough to frighten the US public.  The towers were brought

down

because simply repairing the plane damage wouldn't leave the lasting scar

on

US psyche.  If they came down, it would generate much more fear and anger,
and also would make their new and heavily insured owner an even richer

man.

Some people and their causes were served.  You need to look at this

incident

through their eyes.

How do you set up charges in a manner where they won't go off due to
the fire, but will go off an hour later on command. Do you believe the
rigging could withstand all that heat and motion?

Who said some didn't go off because of fire?  Elsewhere, on lower floors,
NYC firefighters are on videotape describing the sequential boom boom boom
floor by floor of what looked like explosives going off.  Have you seen

that

video?  Please give your opinion of this:

http://re911.temp.powweb.com/wtc/evidence/videos/docs/discussion_in_firehouse.mpg

Now flight 800 is another story. The NTSB findings could be true, or it
could be a cover-up.

Right, a 747 can climb 3000 ft with the front of the plane missing.  Does

it

strike you as odd that the CIA produced the video illustrating this
impossibility?  Or odd that no one could get Jet-A fuel to explode when

they

tried to force the issue during experiments?  So you think that over a
hundred persons were simply wrong, and confused a "flare-like" object

rising

with a burning plane rising.  Right.

But please do share your reaction to the firefighters videotape.  Are they
lying?