Subject: Re: Flight 93: Analysis
From: miso@sushi.com
Date: 03/07/2005, 05:37
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.america-at-war,alt.conspiracy.area51,alt.conspiracy.lady-di,cis.talk,alt.terrorism.world-trade-center

Lots of things "go boom" during a fire. How many things have you bought
that indicate "do not exceed blah blah blah temperature."  CRTs
implode. Pull can mean pull the crew.

You are going at it from the wrong direction. You need to find physical
evidence that proves a bomb or series of bombs went off.  Eye witnesses
are generally well intentioned, but generally not all that trustworthy.
Physical evidence is much more trustworthy.

The worse conspiracy theory was that a plane didn't hit the Pentagon.
If you have ever been to a plane crash, there are upteen parts with
serial numbers on them. Paperwork on plane maintenance is anal
retentive. You find a part, you can say what plane was there. And there
are always parts. Subassemblies just fly off.

As time passes, it is getting easier to blame Shrub and crew for
ineptness. The latest documented screw ups of the FBI came out only
because Moussaoui requested the documents and the government could no
longer stonewall. When the democrats get controll of Congress, the dirt
on the Bush crime family will be exposed.

Incompetent? You bet. Complicit. Not likely.

You want to see the fecal matter distubed? Get Coleen Rowley elected to
the house.