Yeah Qncy, he writes too :-)

Anyway I just wanna let you know that I will hopefully be finishing the
website NEXT week and putting new David Icke audio on it.

Steve

<QncyMI@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:1141243503.405290.56600@t39g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...

unfortunately, he also writes!

thus:
there are several "classical" results, out there,
such as the wrongly-cited Michelson-Morley ones, or
the further refinement by DCMiller, and at least one other,
that I'd just heard about & forgot.  also, from 19th cce.

Of course this was not what was observed.

thus:
well, the "dual version" is the actual "4CT" problem, but
the graphtheoretic version saves trying
to get a toddler to fill-in the blanks for you....
maybe, this was the initial impetus for graphtheory; eh?

thus:
if you look at the last sets of figures in Clinton's paper,
you see that some of the facets become increasingly
nonequiangular, even nonconvex ... but
this could turn-out to be an important feature....
the paper is not that easy to comprehend, though.
http://megadome.com/ --> "Dolgerber Mutations"

thus:
anyway, it was wrong;
there is not just one cell -- "C=1 in 3D" --
which was supposed to be implicit in my statement.

thus quoth:
Let us be precise.  In n-dimensional space the formula is:
   N_0 - N_1 + N_2 - N_3 + ... + (-1)^n.N_n = 1
where N_i is the number of i-dimensional boundaries....
In 2D, 3D and 4D we have N_0 = V, N_1 = E, N_2 = F, N_3 = C and N_4 = H

where H is the number of hypercells (1 in 4D).  (See that it also
matches
when we set F = 1 in 2D and C = 1 in 3D.)...
So actually you should not take 2 as C, but 2 is split as 1 - (-1)^n.
in
the complete alternating formula.

thus:
seriously, Jack actually does have testable hypotheses,
which was shown by his slip-up on the the "Genadi-Shipov drive,"
which was just an obvious table-top concoction.  of course,
when I dyssed that, although he got the "point," he surely
did not bother to reply directly to moi, moiself or Brian....
I think of him more as a New Age Mathematical-physics Savant;
saying it's wrong,wrong,wrong is just as dubious
as lending it any immediate (or posthumous) credence.

--Welcome ot the Googolplex; you can login any time, like, you, but....
http://tarpley.net/bush23.htm
http://www.benfranklinbooks.com/
http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac
http://www.wlym.com/pdf/iclc/howthenation.pdf
http://larouchepub.com/other/2003/3048iraq_58_const.html
http://www.rand.org/publications/randreview/issues/rr.12.00/
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/figs/plate01.html