| Subject: Re: The Apollo Moon Landings Are Science Fiction |
| From: quintal |
| Date: 25/05/2007, 13:11 |
| Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.conspiracy.area51,soc.culture.usa |
On Thu, 24 May 2007 21:43:05 -0400, Phoon Hencman <Henc@ican.net>
wrote:
On 2007-05-24 04:08:36 -0400, "npsm" <nspm@aol.com> said:
The Space Shuttle, so far, has killed fourteen people, merely trying to
attain an orbit about two hundred fifty miles above the Earth.
How is it then, that a third of a century ago, with less computing power
in the entire rocket than in a present day twenty dollar Wal-Mart watch,
NASA claims to have gone 100,000% farther, six different times
between 1969 and 1972, landing on another celestial body and then
returning, without ever killing anyone?
How could they have powered air conditioning in two hundred fifty
degree heat for three days with batteries?
Why is the "second round" of "returning" to the moon estimated to be
no earlier than half a century after the first?
(Would there be a fifty-year span between the first and second
trips across the Atlantic in an airplane?)
If the moon landings were, as we believe, a government deception, then
George Orwell's comment, "whoever controls the past, controls the future"
is a scary wakeup call to insist that our government reform to the
truthfulness of our founding father "who could not tell a lie."
Otherwise, the powers that be (The Zionist Network) will continue their
addiction to deception and we all will be worse off for it.
Go back to sleep. We went, deal with it.
I'm really not sure.... or I'm really not sure that "we" didnt go to
the moon. Case in doubt.