| Subject: Re: The Apollo Moon Landings Are Science Fiction |
| From: BradGuth |
| Date: 29/05/2007, 19:44 |
| Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.conspiracy.area51,alt.fr.politique.fiction,fr.soc.complots,soc.culture.usa |
One more time for the old Usenet fuckology gipper.
On May 29, 6:40 am, "BogusID" <Bogu...@YesItIs.com> wrote:
"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180286753.667899.259320@r19g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On May 27, 3:52 am, Phoon Hencman <H...@ican.net> wrote:
On 2007-05-26 23:12:14 -0400, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> said:
For something that grand and terribly spendy, as such there's no good
science or physics reason(s) why there's any doubt whatsoever, but yet
there's lots of reasonable doubt pertaining to our having supposedly
walked on that physically dark, somewhat salty, otherwise naked and
thus unavoidably anticathodemoonof ours.
For starters, where's Venus?
Western sky after sunset.
That's exactly what I'd expect from the typical naysay Jewspeak wisdom
of this infomercial spewing Usenet that sucks and blows worse off than
our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush).
Obviously I'm wright as rain about our NOT having walked on that nasty
moonof ours, because it would have been too easy for you folks to
have proven otherwise by way of presenting your best interactive 3D
solar system simulator, of which you silly folks wouldn't dare to
share that well established simulator capability because of all of
God's honest truth there is to behold.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
There's enough proof for me to easily believe man went to the moon, and no
conclusive proof for me to believe we didn't.
Then obviously you and others of your silly kind don't believe in the
regular laws of physics, but you'll accept hocus-pocus infomercial
crapolla any day of the week. Now I understand your pathetic faith-
based mindset of naysayism and of such total denial of being in
denial.
What do you have, some pictures that show double shadows from different
light source directions?
Others have that to go with, whereas I've got Venus situated above
that physically dark horizon, and a few other pesky Kodak worthy
moments, plus a spare load of rocket science that still doesn't add
up.
Double shadowing happens here when the moon is full at night tool, consider
the Earth might reflect more sunlight than the moon does.
You are a double shadowing liar, or that of something far worse, arnt
you.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell