| Subject: Re: The Apollo Moon Landings Are Science Fiction |
| From: "BogusID" <BogusID@YesItIs.com> |
| Date: 29/05/2007, 20:32 |
| Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.conspiracy.area51 |
"BradGuth" <bradguth@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1180464249.168405.89790@o11g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
There's enough proof for me to easily believe man went to the moon, and no conclusive proof for me to believe we didn't.Then obviously you and others of your silly kind don't believe in the regular laws of physics, but you'll accept hocus-pocus infomercial crapolla any day of the week. Now I understand your pathetic faith- based mindset of naysayism and of such total denial of being in denial.
NAYSAYISM - aren't YOU the one saying NAY we didn't go there?
What do you have, some pictures that show double shadows from different light source directions?Others have that to go with, whereas I've got Venus situated above that physically dark horizon, and a few other pesky Kodak worthy moments, plus a spare load of rocket science that still doesn't add up.
Do you have a link to share, or is that part of your personal collection?
Double shadowing happens here when the moon is full at night tool, consider the Earth might reflect more sunlight than the moon does.You are a double shadowing liar, or that of something far worse, arnt you.
Honestly, you should ask you parents to let you stay out after dark when a full moon is out. You will see moon shadows, and secondary shadows form street lighting. If you care to actually engage in a conversation instead of acting like a defensive religious nut, great.