On Jun 5, 12:39 pm, "BogusID" <Bogu...@YesItIs.com> wrote:

"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1181066572.708882.268210@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com...

On May 29, 1:57 pm, "BogusID" <Bogu...@YesItIs.com> wrote:

"BradGuth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message

snip...

Dear dumbfounded spook/mole "BogusID",
Yes I have replicated proof positive, as well as having the regular
laws of physics on my side, whereas otherwise you and others of your
silly infomercial spewing kind should go fish.
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell

QUACK, you talk about proof but decline to share any images or web links...

What's up with that?

Also, most of us do already understand the laws of physics if not take them
for granted, so stop using that bantha fodder to dilute the topic.

Show us your "proof", and please do better than spouting
"http://www.moonmovie.com" or "http://www.apfn.org/apfn/moon_land.htm"

Are you claiming that your PC or MAC isn't working?

Sadly, there are no such pictures of the laws of physics.

Are you claiming there's no such thing as an anti-cathode, and
therefore no such gamma or hard-Xrays to behold?

What if anything is keeping our moon from being radiation dosage
greater than anything within the Van Allen belts?

However, in spite of all the local Sv/rads, and of a few other pesky
factors, there are many pictures of Venus and even a few other items
along with our physically dark moon, by which more than proves those
unfiltered Kodak moments had way more than sufficient DR to work with.

Where's Venus?
-
Brad Guth
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell