krackula wrote:

On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 11:11:46 -0700, "Lumpy"
<lumpy@digitalcartography.com> wrote:

krackula wrote:

...some of the links above contain very interesting
information , especially when compared against the USGS station
equipment.  the chart result of traces is quite different from USGS
and the equipment differences explain why.  also, maps of sensor
placement  ( usgs and the others )  are interesting to ponder as well...

One of the pages mentions that the sensors around Corn Creek
are funded by the DOE and also serve some kind of Antelope
Habitat study.

Looking at the placement of sensors, there are installations
at Warm Springs, TTR and several other locations surrounding
the ranges. It also seems that there are a comparitively large
number of faults around the ranges. It would make sense for
the DOE to study what the earth is doing before storing
nuclear waste or blowing up a big can of oil.


Lumpy

You Played on Lawrence Welk?
Yes but no blue notes. Just blue hairs.

www.lumpyguitar.net

well ......... if that's the case , it's nice of them to finally think
of this stuff ...... decades after the horse is out of the barn isn't it  !   ha ha hahahah ahaah   
still doncha think that ,  if purely quake related , that USGS
equipment is totally adequate  for that application ?  it easily
identifies all  those mag1 surface sonic booms - explosions
on a daily basis , doesn't it ?  that , and why does this equipment
display quake - shake data in frequency ranges unimportant to USGS ?     why indeed ?  

I am sure the conspiracy theorists will be able to make something of this :-
<http://www.iris.edu/USArray/EllenMaterial/usarray/array_design/array_design.html#trans_array_anchor>