On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:35:12 -0700, miso@sushi.com wrote:

On Jun 29, 10:36 pm, krackula <krack...@i.am> wrote:

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 18:29:48 -0700, "Lumpy"

<l...@digitalcartography.com> wrote:

m...@sushi.com wrote:

http://www.lazygranch.com/tikroad.htm

In case you missed the lengthy discussion,
here's the website that displays the
seismic measurements from that station -
http://rev.seis.sc.edu/stations/TA/T11A?station_dbid=1586

hey lump ........

these   so called  seismic charts  for that station you mentioned  "
do not compute " .   many of the traces show " high freq "
motion detection , like ( say )  a wind storm would produce on a
unfiltered sensor.  sensors that detect wind ,
or ANY high frequency motions  ( above 10hz , but often above even 4.5
hz )  are of absolutely NO use to  monitor seismic  earthquake
activities.

for example ...... push the " back " button
to page 2007-06-25 ... 2007-06-26  and look
 there is NO such thing as a 24 hour earthquake.
 all of these 2 hour traces are showing wind induced
sensor activity.  go forward to the next day and it's a quieter day
with what looks like a little local truck / car traffic.
( 22:00 )

the next day shows almost no wind and
 a couple of interesting trapezoidal
motion prints .......  VERY interesting . also not  a natural
earth wave.  there are also a few typical seismic events , but FAR too
few to be a real life  earthquake record.  a typical day
here has dozens of  tiny  quake events, never seen a quite day ever !

don't know what kind of info they are gathering at the sites,
but it's  definitely  not basic quake data....... it's something
totally different seismically speaking  !   maybe those charts aren't
really what's happening at all.  seems odd that someone would spend
all that money and time to sit and watch the wind blow their sensors
from some remote site !!!

There's another monitoring station SW of there
Code: TA.U11A
Name: Corn Creek, NV, USA
Location: 36.42 N, 115.38 W

And there's another on someone's property in Rach-town.
All curiously set up to monitor earth movement south
and east of a place where there may or may not be
a big boom test, if the politics ever work out.

Lumpy

You were the "OPERATION" game voice?
Yes. Take out wrenched ankle.

www.lumpyvoice.com

The sensors are beneath ground, so I don't think there is a wind issue.

the charts speak for themselves.   if , for example, you are reading a
EGK strip chart and you see an elevated " T " wave ........ it's an
elevated T wave.  if you see  a signature " wind " trace , it's a wind
trace.    a  rose is a rose, by any other name.  that , and if it WAS
ground tremble for that long and magnitude ( never mind it's a sig 
wind wave )  you'd have to be  ( should be ) seismically afraid , that
or  possibly  think tunnel boring  equipment is afoot  ( this ,
especially for you conspiracy people out there  ) .  if you don't
think " normal " ( usgs )  tremble  data then maybe ' wind " isn't as
much as an issue as a desirable element.  meaning your equipment is
set up in a  way that happens to see " some "  types of wind activity
and as a side effect and  happens to be a handy indication that your
equipment sensitivity and settings are still  " spot on " so to speak.


THESE charts show some VERY interesting  " stuff " .......
take a look at those trapezoidal waves , for example. is there 
some unfortunate  resonance ( ringing ) in the deployment their
equipment applications ?? 
or is THAT evidence of something FAR more interesting ??

yaya yaahah ah a ahaa   ( no trapezoidal waves  exist in nature,
or do they ??  )   only their hairdresser ( engineers ) knows for sure
!  

fun stuff ........ see !!  I told you to make yourself some
seismic - infrasonic  toys to take with you.  you can even hide them
in those fiberglass rocks and come back  and " dump "  or retrieve
them at a later time if you want !  < wink >