Subject: Should.
From: "john f winston" <johnfwin@mlode.com>
Date: 24/07/2007, 06:35
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.area51

Subject: Did Noah Build The Ark?  Part 5.                    July 22, 2007.

  Here they examine some of the rivets used in the construction of the Ark.
It would be my humble suggestion that all who are interested in this
material take a look at the pictures on the following web site:
http://www.barry.warmkessel.com

............................................................................
....
............................................................................
....

  Figure 3. The General External Image Of The Ark.
  http://www.wyattmuseum.com/noahs-ark-05.htm
  Mapping of the Ark's bulkheads was no casual affair. Sophisticated
ground penetrating radar was employed to outline the remains of the
relic. See Figure 4. Note elements of the two long longitudinal
bulkheads extend outside the hull.

                                  Figure 4.

  Ground Penetrating Radar Ark Bulkhead Map. Note: 20' (typo 26')
  http://www.barry.warmkessel.com/barry/wpe1C.jpg
  Fore And Aft Reversed.
  A metal detector found about 3,400 iron masses, and these were mostly
spaced at a nominal 21-inch interval. A total of 5,400 such places
(both estimated and found) show linear patterns consistent with the
shape of the hull. Stakes were driven at these locations and yellow
surveyors ribbon laid on the ground over them. They depicted both
contoured patterns of longitudinal and transverse lines. The Ark had
apparently slid downhill after beaching (possibly at a much later
date) and struck a rock. One part of the forward port side was impaled,
and the location lines compressed neatly around the rock.

                           Figure 5.

      The Ark's Hull Structural Outline As Defined By Iron Signatures.

  Rivets or some sort of metallic fasteners were also found by Wyatt.
See Figures 6. The fossilized object shows circular impressions left
from striking an apparently heated metal rivet.

                                Figure 6.

  A Fossilized Metal Rivet Found By Wyatt.
  The Ark relic shows vertical and horizontal stratigraphy. Recovered
joints structures indicate that they were held together with hexagonal
arrays of six rivets with a seventh central rivet.
http://www.bibleplus.org/discoveries/noahsark.htm

                             NOAH'S ARK REDISCOVERED!

  http://www.arkdiscovery.com/noah's_ark.htm

                           THIS IS NOAH'S ARK!!!
                           Lots Of Metal Residue.

  PROFILE OF NOAH'S ARK SHOWS CLEAR VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL STRATIGRAPHY
Figure 7 shows the outline of the hull that reveals vertical slabs
(Rib-Slabs) of "something" that was placed along the hull's exterior.
  Their purpose is believed to be to protect the softer reed structures
from contact damage. The hull and superstructure were formed of reeds
laid in a sealing cement-like material. Then the sides, including the
inside of the Moon Pool
http://www.barry.warmkessel.com/barry/NOAH.html
discussed later, was coated with a bituminous clay compound. The curved
vertical slabs were affixed outside the sealed hull.
  Figure 7. Hull Outline From Ark Rib-Slab Remains.
  An unusual chip of rock is found about two miles west of Kazan. See
Figure 8.
  When it is tapped with a rock, it emits a hollow sound. It is about
16 inches thick and appears to have been made of bundled reeds. There
are seven crosses inscribed in it. This is in an area that has very
few trees. This is thought to be part of the Ark's deckhouse, but there
is no certain way to tell where it may have come from.
  Figure 8. Bundled Reeds Chip From The Ark (Or Deck House Covering).
  Figure 9 is a petrified wood sample recovered from the Ark site using
Ground Penetration Radar to locate a structural member. Its collection
was done under Turkish g-vernment supervision. Specifically: "G-vernor
E-inci issued instructions that the American crew was to stay upon the
hill. They were not to film this event, for it was his. He allowed some
journalists, a Turkish cameraman, some members of the m-litary, and
other dignitaries only to witness the next events. . . The Go-ernor
then ordered one of the soldiers to dig at the location Ron had
indicated, which he did.
  There soon emerged what looked like a flat rock. As more dirt was
removed, it could be seen that it was about 18 inches long and it was
then removed. All captured on film, it was obvious that it was a
petrified section of a hand-hewn timber! . . . The Gov-rnor . . . told
Ron Wyatt to take it to the S-ates and have it tested. He then placed
it in the radar case, which would protect the extremely valuable
specimen during transport. The entire event was shown throughout Turkey
on TRT (Turkish Radio and Television). . . "
  Figure 9. A Hewn Timber Section.
  The
http://www.christcenteredmall.com/discoveries/noahs-ark-page-2.htm
test result showed it almost totally petrified, with only 0.71% total
carbon, but only 0.0081% inorganic while 0.7019% organic - a 100 times
more organic than inorganic carbon! Laboratory analysis was performed
on artifact labeled
http://www.wyattmuseum.com/noahs-ark-08.htm
"deck timber". G-lbraith Labs in Knoxville, Tennessee tested samples
taken both from within the "formation' and from without. All of the
laboratory procedures were videotaped, including the taking the sample
from the specimen, and the actual execution of the analyses.
  Figure 10. Notice This Ark Artifact Illustrates Three Equal Width
(Laminated?) Sections. Other petrified wood samples were also excavated
in the presence of a number of Turkish officials. One piece was sawn
in several places, exposing
http://www.bibleplus.org/discoveries/noahsark.htm
lamination of 3 layers exposing the wood grain.
See Figure 10.
http://www.exchangedlife.com/wyatt/noah.html
considers the petrified wood to be laminated and it contained a much
higher carbon content than the surrounding area (4.95% carbon compared
to 1.88% for specimens from the surrounding area). The high
concentration of carbon was consistent with the presence of prior living
matter, such as decayed or petrified wood. It also showed a surprisingly
high iron content. There are other pieces of even more convincing
http://anchorstone.com/newpics/petrified01.jpg
petrified wood findings, but their precise location has not been
provided.
  Likewise, ancient
http://ren.netconnect.com.au/~leedas/noahb.html
marine plywood' containing petrified resin which has oozed from between
layers and the heads of nails remain. Thin sections revealed that it
consisted of three laminated layers. Despite these finds, petrified
wood offers the weakest evidence of the Ark relic because it is so
easily formed.
http://www.wyattnewsletters.com/noahark/fibers.htm
  Fibers also have been recovered from the Ark relic. Some fibers
revealed all of the features characteristic of mammal hair while others
some sort of plant fiber as the cellular structure was plainly visible.
Another hair-like fiber was evaluated which revealed very unusual
characteristics: the shaft was long and cylindrical like hair, but
revealed nothing commonly associated with hair. Along the outer surface
of the fiber, angular spines extended from the shaft. The specialists
believed this to be some sort of plant fiber but all agreed that they
had never seen anything like it.

                                THE METALLURGY

  The metallurgy offers the initial clue that something unusual is
associated with the Ark relic. Iron residue is found throughout, but the
Iron Age did not start until about 800 BC in Egypt. It started earlier
around 1100 BC or 1200 BC in Crete and Greece. There is some data that
indicates that iron was obtained from local ores (not meteorites) as
early as 2500 - 2700 BC by primitive metallurgical processes. Oxidized
beads dating to 4000 BC have also been discovered. There is documented
evidence that an iron tool was found in the Great Pyramid of Giza
dating to <3100> BC around the time of the Noah's Flood.
  Adding to this consternation is the presence of a carbonized iron
(steel) dagger in the museum at Ankera possibly dating as early as
2900 BC.
http://www.biblerevelations.org/ronwyatt/noahsark2.htm
  "Noah's Ark - The Evidence" lists the composition of many of the
metallic finds. Note that chemical analyses are always reported as
oxides because most metals oxidize over the course of thousands of
years. These metallic residues shows not only is this relic the Ark
of Noah, but also that its construction was by a-gels (or aliens as
they are now called) as described previously in the book of Noah.
  Metal is found in the rivets, washers, brackets as well as the
ballast spilled from a breach in the relic. Some of the results are
considered below and the words are largely those of Mary Nell Wyatt.

                                Iron Rivets

  As Ron and the group approached "Noah's Ark" from the south end, he
noticed an object that bore the shape of a very large
http://www.wyattmuseum.com/noahs-ark-10.htm
"rivet" head with a washer around it. The analyses of the
http://www.wyattmuseum.com/images/wpeB.gif
"rivet" revealed the following and lots of silica as would be expected
from a fossilized metallic object.
  TABLE 2
  RIVET COMPOSITION
  Metal Oxide
  Percent composition
  15.84 Fe
  13.02 CaO
  3.97 MgO
  1.98 ----
  2.93 SiO

Part 5.

John Winston.         Johnfw@mlode.com
Subject: Spacecrafts Over Roseville, Calif.                  July 23, 2007.

  This information has been sent to another person and he sent it to me.

...........................................................................
...........................................................................

Subject:  1:58 pm PDT bulletin: 100-starcraft formation 2000' over
Roseville California right now
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:31:44 +0000
From: "Richard Boylan PhD" <drboylan@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:05:41 -0700

Friends,

     As I write this, a fleet of 100 starcraft are in formation over
Roseville (a suburb of Sacramento), California.
     Army Sergeant Justin J-hnson, a friend, just phoned me that the
fleet is in a formation of two long lines, and hovering or very slowly
moving at 2000' altitude above Roseville.
     Justin was dumbfounded at the size of this formation, which dwarfs
the five-craft display of presence over Lima, Peru some weeks ago.
     The craft are best seen with sunglasses to cut through the glare
from the sun on the smoggy air. Justin says that when a craft tilts
slightly, the glint of reflected sunlight is quite distinct.
     Apparently the Star Visitors are ramping up the size of their
demonstration-of-presence flights over major population centers.
     All to the good, as the UFO Cover-Up slowly but surely crumbles.

           in the light,

           Richard Bo-lan, Ph.D.


Richard Boy-an, Ph.D., LLC; Councillor
President, Star Kids Project, Ltd
Email: drboylan@sbcglobal.net
Website:  www.drboylan.com <http://www.drboylan.com/>
Diamond Springs, California 95619,  USA
   To subscribe to my free email newsletter: send one email to:
DrRichBoylanReports-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

John Winston.   johnfw@mlode.com