| Subject: Re: What I should have done |
| From: røBstëR |
| Date: 07/11/2007, 23:34 |
| Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.area51 |
I take your point about front end filtering on a hand held frequency
counter. I've read that they have a tendency to lock onto the
strongest signal. And to be honest I hadn't really appreciated how
much RF there is in the area.
The log periodic is a good idea, but they are a bit bulky - mind you,
so is a 2m yagi - what about a small dish, something like an old sat
TV dish? Not sure how you could rig the counter or scanner up, with a
replacement for the LNB. What I'm thinking is a way to null out RF
from other directions. But then again, maybe thats not going to be
needed.
I like the idea of Signal Stalker, I'm still using some 80's gear that
is very basic by todays standards - I'd upgrade, but with the
inception of encryption I haven't bothered so far. Incidentally, is
much of the radio traffic in the area encrypted or digital?
Do we know about any HF from the base - many air bases have a standby
HF system - although can't remember reading about HF or seeing any
antennas on Google Earth? If they are testing what I think they are
testing, you can imagine an aircraft going out of VHF range real
quickly.
And what about UHF Satcom? Surely that gotta be there.