| Subject: Re: Radar Perimeter monitoring |
| From: miso@sushi.com |
| Date: 20/07/2008, 06:29 |
| Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.area51 |
On Jul 19, 8:15 pm, krackula <krackula.i.am> wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:57:12 -0700 (PDT), Hiram
<thedeerhunter...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 17 Jul, 20:49, m...@sushi.com wrote:
Well, if it can tell the difference between a person and a bovine.....
Yeah good point.
It's hard to know how sophisticated the software is that runs it - but
watching a video on their site seems to the software tells the
difference in objects by how they move.
you guys are really kidding about all this aren't you , or
possibly making fun of the several uwbsarsurv-sats they moved off
from domestic assignments / testing ( to the mideast ) ?
those 1st gen uwb units have been airborne for several years, now
and even UAVs fly with 4th - 5th gen units attached to their
underbellies ! there are probably so many " birds " up now they are
practically bumping into each other. heard they were one of GW's
pet projects aimed towards border control as well ( probably built
by some of his business buddies h aha ha ha ) .
hear tell that "all " the important local " special " spots are still
being " toasted " 24/7 as they supposedly have for several years
now.
supposedly the navy owns the satnet ( I dunno , go figure ) hardware
but the cammo dudes are taped into some ( very little ) of it as
well. at least , the ones over this way are.
ground based surveillance radar went out with the covered wagon ......
heck you even see them ( the 15km 8087 jobbies ) on ebay from time
to time.
The Nellis range is a place where it is hard to use airborne assets
It can be a wicked job of air traffic control. Just recall that Janet
they had to send to the TTR just to get it out of the way. Then would
you stage this snooper plane at the base? If so, fly it 24 and 7? I
don't think the place is that crazy about security given the buffer
zone is so wide.