| Subject: Re: Mysterious Black Box at Rachel Area 51 Gate |
| From: Desert Shadow |
| Date: 20/06/2009, 02:00 |
| Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.area51 |
On Jun 18, 11:40 pm, "Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote:
Desert Shadow wrote:
...I am basically ignored
because I don't fit their image of a good Area 51 Researcher.
You aren't a good researcher.
It's just that simple. Has nothing
to do with anyone's "image" of what
a good researcher should be.
Doesn't make you a bad guy. Just means that serious/mature
researchers won't give you much credence.
Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke
www.n0eq.com
One thing you need to realize, Lumpy I have never pretend to be a
researcher like most people on the various sites. The folks on the
other sites can call themselves researchers or whatever they want. I
am interested in Area 51 and everything that surrounds it. I go out
and take pictures of things that interest me. I am no researcher, and
I have never pretended to be. I leave that stuff up to Miso! If I
find something that needs answers, he is the man to ask. That's all!
I am not a bad guy for being interested in Bob Lazar, John Lear, or
any other interesting part of the Area 51 puzzle! I once posted on
another forum and stated that Glenn was the one I considered "an
original Area 51 researcher". You should have seen the posts trying
to insult me and say I should apologize to the webmaster for all his
hard work. What the hell did my post have to do with him. So many
people have such thin skin at certain sites! Nobody should get banned
from a forum over jealousy or any other "thin skinned" reason. There
is plenty of Area 51 research to be done by whoever wants to call
themselves a researcher. Not me! I do what I do for my own
entertainment.