| Subject: Re: Outdoor RCS Range and the Triangular Tower at Area 51 |
| From: Desert Shadow |
| Date: 16/07/2009, 02:17 |
| Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.area51 |
On Jul 15, 12:47 am, "m...@sushi.com" <m...@sushi.com> wrote:
On Jul 14, 11:57 pm, Desert Shadow <rch49...@cox.net> wrote:
Miso, what info can you give about one of your pictures of the new
tower at Groom showing up on The Howland Company website. Are they
saying that they built it or had anything to do with it? And do we
know for sure it deals with RCS?
Oh, I'm not too sure how much I want to say on usenet. Howland has
permission from me to use the photo, so you can infer we had some
contact. Now they can't exactly say they built that area, but hey, it
is on their website....doh!
There is a funny thread on DLR about the photo when it first appeared
on the net. You might make an interesting discovery if you find the
thread and read all the posts. This will be a test of your powers of
observation. I'll give you one clue: "traffic analysis."
If you never read those James Bamford books on the NSA, do so. At
least "Body of Secrets." You can learn a lot about methodology in the
information gathering business. The claim is his "Puzzle Palace" is
required reading for NSA recruits. His writing style improved over
the years. "Shadow Factory" is a pretty easy read. Puzzle Palace was a
bit disjointed at times, and occasionally the information included was
damn silly. [What NSA director had sex with a farm animal. Hey, too
much detail!]
I couldn't find the thread on DLR. I read almost all of the post from
this site. Look, I can replace batteries in a radio, that is about
all the technology I am familiar with. I read two interesting ideas
for the towers purpose: the blimp or some type of observation
platform. Then you said, you know whats in the new hangar. Hello,
what??? I am convinced you are the Area 51 guru. Can you help
clarify the new hangar and the tower? Please!!