| Subject: Re: mountain facility? |
| From: obviouslydelusional |
| Date: 23/10/2009, 19:34 |
| Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.area51 |
On Oct 22, 6:51 am, "Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote:
m...@sushi.com wrote:http://www.lazygranch.com/images/bonanza/bnz_mountain_facility_1.jpg http://www.lazygranch.com/images/bonanza/bnz_mountain_facility_2.jpg 37.159145° -115.927415° on Google EarthMatch?If the facility matches up, which dry lake is in the background in your pic? I can't see what it could be. Looks like Papoose, which wouldn't put that facility in the coord's above. But I don't know if it can be Papoose. Dilusional suggests that lake is tucked out of site from your viewpoint. I guess compare to the old Mayhood or Glenn's photos of Papoose. Weren't those from Sterling? Any chance your facility could be near Frenchman? Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke www.n0eq.com
After some serious work with Google Earth, I conclude that the dry lake in the background here HAS to be Papoose. Makes sense, as it's to the left of Groom Lake, and as you said, there are older images from Mt. Stirling showing Papoose. The tongue area is blocked by the butte in the foreground, but there are some "teeth" visible on the westerly shoreline that match. So disregard what I said. I now know what I'm talking about. Maybe. Flip. Flop. As for the "mountain facility" it all looks like random rocks to me. Unless....that's what they want you to think.
