| Subject: Re: mountain facility? |
| From: "miso@sushi.com" <miso@sushi.com> |
| Date: 24/10/2009, 08:39 |
| Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.area51 |
On Oct 23, 11:34 am, obviouslydelusional
<obviouslydelusio...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 22, 6:51 am, "Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote:
m...@sushi.com wrote:
http://www.lazygranch.com/images/bonanza/bnz_mountain_facility_1.jpg
http://www.lazygranch.com/images/bonanza/bnz_mountain_facility_2.jpg
37.159145° -115.927415° on Google Earth
Match?
If the facility matches up, which dry lake
is in the background in your pic? I can't see
what it could be.
Looks like Papoose, which wouldn't put that
facility in the coord's above. But I don't
know if it can be Papoose. Dilusional suggests
that lake is tucked out of site from your viewpoint.
I guess compare to the old Mayhood or Glenn's photos of Papoose.
Weren't those from Sterling?
Any chance your facility could be near Frenchman?
Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke
www.n0eq.com
After some serious work with Google Earth, I conclude that the dry
lake in the background here HAS to be Papoose. Makes sense, as it's
to the left of Groom Lake, and as you said, there are older images
from Mt. Stirling showing Papoose. The tongue area is blocked by the
butte in the foreground, but there are some "teeth" visible on the
westerly shoreline that match. So disregard what I said. I now know
what I'm talking about. Maybe. Flip. Flop.
As for the "mountain facility" it all looks like random rocks to me.
Unless....that's what they want you to think.
A grayscale zoom:
<http://www.lazygranch.com/images/bonanza/bnz_facility_zoom_bw.jpg>
