| Subject: Re: Did Area 51 disappear from ATS |
| From: "miso@sushi.com" <miso@sushi.com> |
| Date: 13/05/2010, 05:33 |
| Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.area51 |
On May 12, 5:32 pm, Desert Shadow <rch49...@cox.net> wrote:
On May 12, 3:00 pm, "m...@sushi.com" <m...@sushi.com> wrote:
On May 12, 9:46 am, Desert Shadow <rch49...@cox.net> wrote:
On May 11, 10:44 pm, "m...@sushi.com" <m...@sushi.com> wrote:
On May 11, 5:05 pm, Desert Shadow <rch49...@cox.net> wrote:
On May 11, 12:56 pm, Desert Shadow <rch49...@cox.net> wrote:
On May 11, 11:42 am, "m...@sushi.com" <m...@sushi.com> wrote:
On May 11, 4:29 am, "Lumpy" <lu...@digitalcartography.com> wrote:
m...@sushi.com wrote:
It is still there, just very few actual posts are on Area 51!
What's the current hot topic over there at that daycare site?
Craig 'Lumpy' Lemke
www.n0eq.com
Most of the dreamlandresort readers hang out there, so there is lots
of duplication. Janet watching was probably the most relevant post.
You still get the Dulce crowd, which is about as silly as the stealth
blimp.
I put that same "tall hangar" photo on ATS and got no replies, much
like here. The structure screams rocket to me. What else is tall and
skinny and found at an airbase?
Why would a rocket be at Groom Lake? Why wouldn't the Af just us
Vandenberg or Edwards? Why would they go to the trouble of building
a hangar when everything they need is just up the road and Edwards and
especially Vandenberg?
I thought maybe at first glance they were tanks, but a closer look
rules that out. That looks too small for a hanger, but it is really
tall. Very strange. I would like to put the photo on the forum at
DLR and see what the guesses are.
I would assume DLR has a similar image since I shot that last year, so
it is not new. I was so focused on the hangar that I missed the other
new building. My viewing conditions were crap raised to infinity. OK,
maybe crap cubed. Anyway, Peter M. posts on ATS, and he is probably
the best person to evaluate the building. I didn't specifically ask
his opinion, but I assume he shrugged his shoulders like the rest of
us since he didn't comment.
I should have said missile, not rocket, since rocket gives the image
of the thing leaving orbit. The TTR launches missiles once in a while,
but they usually terminate on the range. But missile are usually not
stored vertically.
They have a tall crane at the base, but they make no attempt to hide
it.
Could there be some sort of instrumentation tower the base doesn't
want photographed, so they move it out of the tall hangar only for
tests? I would think it would have a track to roll the thing out of
the building.
I am seriously interested in what it could be. No, I don't think DLR
has the photo. You have the best photos and most complete inventory.
I would like to get some feedback from DLR, but I am not sure what you
think about the photo going on their discussion forum.
That wheresjanet orifice stuff steals my photos all the time and puts
them on DLR. I can't get imageshack to shut the guy down, though they
do remove my images when I ask.
Well I'm certain DLR will get a photo of the area soon. Tis the
season. You may recall that Springsteen song "Summer's here and the
time is right for climbing Tikaboo with a telescope on your back." It
was from "The Wild, the Innocent, and the Tikaboo slide."
Tikaboo is kind of tricky. Forget March. There is usually snow on the
peak. April sometimes works. Wait too long and you risk lightning. May
is usually fine. California burns all summer, putting smoke in the
air, often reaching the Nellis range. That leaves September or October
for Tikaboo. I did the trip once in November after the Nellis Airshow
and it was mighty cold at night.
I totally understand. I respect the fact that you work hard for those
photos. The "wheresjanet" guy on DLR is a 15 year old kid from the LA
area. He does have a really nice camera and lense. I met him and his
mom a few months ago at the Little A Le Inn. I have noticed he takes
photos and posts them on DLR all the time asking questions about each
of them. I have seen some of your work on the DLR forum. I don't
even think about posting somebody's photos without their consent.
Looking at the photo again
http://www.lazygranch.com/images/a51pan/oct2009/tall_building.jpg
maybe this is just a taxiway with a nice clean (grubbed) land next to
the taxiway. In other words, maybe tall building is just a stripe on
the ground. The image is so poor you really can't tell.
