| Subject: Re: Tonopah Test Range "open for business" |
| From: "miso@sushi.com" <miso@sushi.com> |
| Date: 30/12/2010, 22:23 |
| Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.area51,rec.aviation.military |
On Dec 30, 12:03 am, Ron <nmfirepi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 29, 8:54 pm, "m...@sushi.com" <m...@sushi.com> wrote:
On Dec 29, 4:11 pm, Ron <nmfirepi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 29, 3:24 pm, "m...@sushi.com" <m...@sushi.com> wrote:
I pulled this out of the Sandia March newsletter:
http://www.lazygranch.com/ttr.htm#ttropenforbusiness
Do you know what that Project site # is for tonopah? I know groom is
22, but I forgot what TTR is.
The department number for the Sandia portion of the TTR is 2915. I'm
not familiar with groom being 22. Are you thinking of "station"
numbers?
Its definitely Project Site, abbreviated to PS, Groom is PS 22, thats
mentioned on the old Ufomind site of Glenn also.
Tonopah has a #, and from an email I recieved, even Palmdale USAF
plant has a PS number too.
http://www.ufomind.com/area51/ref/glossary.shtml
It is in the glossary, but only for Groom. I've never heard it used.
A search on UFO mind for "project site" comes up empty. He doesn't
list it as project site, but just mentiones PS-22. A google search on
PS-22 with Groom Lake just brings up copies of Glenn's glossary. If it
is a real term, only Glenn knows about it.
The "station" designations are certainly for real. They are used on
the radio all the time.