Subject: How Did We Get Here? Part 3.
From: "John Winston" <johnfw@mlode.com>
Date: 26/03/2011, 15:06
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.area51

Subject: How Did We Get Here?  Part 3.                           Mar. 26, 
2011.

  This shows where some of the different colors of people came from.

......................................................
......................................................

The initial attempts were to `test the waters,' so to speak. The
metaphor the Nine uses is that, like any good gardener, if you are
unsure of your soil you will plant many types of species. The kinds you
initially plant are the kinds you most want to be the main structure of
your garden and to see which of those will survive. Then you arrange and
cultivate and look to see what is working and what is not. After that
you do a little grafting, a little cross-hybridization, to see if you
can come up with that perfect show piece that will take top honors at
the next bi-annual fair. That, too, is how the Planet Earth experiment
was conceived to be.

To give you a background with which to work, and to orient your time
clock in as short amount of space as we can, we have included a brief
rundown of the human population on the Earth as it is currently recorded
in most of the scientific textbooks in schools:

         First came the creature known as Ramapithecus. Living 15-20
million years ago, it was a tree dwelling simple tool-user without
visible ancestors or descendants.

         About the same time was Australopithecus, a creature also
living 15-20 million years ago, but one which mysteriously died out.

        In 1946, the huge bones of Gigantopithecus were discovered
and dated back to nearly 10 million years ago. Gigantopithecus, sounding
much like what Brother Philip describes as the Els, stood more than 8
feet tall and weighed 400 to 500 pounds. In the 1940s, Gigantopithecus
was thought to be a good candidate for a missing link; but, like
Ramapithecus, it is now thought to be `an e-olutionary side
branch'.

The fossils of Gigantopithecus and Ramapithecus, if not human ancestors,
were supposedly contemporary with our true ancestor. These primates were
indeed giants and dwarfs, some living earlier than 10 million years ago,
the time in which Edgar Cayce says human beings first appeared on Earth.
These were not anatomically modern people. Our ancestors likely did have
"tails" though just as there are incidences of children still
being born with tails today.

         Homo habilis came around 3,500,000 years ago. He was an
upright, tool-using, hunting, home-dwelling Being who looked much like
proto-humans (proto as in prototypes), although definite ancestral links
to us have not yet been established.

         Homo erectus came roughly between 750,000 and 250,000 years
ago. He was a stone-axe user, a fire-kindler and a hut-builder, with a
brain somewhat comparable to ours. The females no longer went `on
heat' (oestrus), and offspring went through a more prolonged
infancy. Cultural growth was beginning and signs of humanity were
evident.

         There is no demonstrated relationship between Homo erectus
and Neanderthal man - Homo Neanderthalis - who appeared about 300,000
years ago, wearing clothes, practicing ritual burials and w-rfare, but
who mysteriously and quickly disappeared as well some 35,000 years ago.
The Neanderthals displayed virtually no technological innovation during
more than 100,000 years of their existence on the planet. They simply
disappeared. They didn't interbreed, nor were they k-lled off by the
Cro-Magnons. Modern humans are not descended from Neanderthals but did
co-exist with them about 40,000 years ago, according to the latest
scientific research recently released.

In Marlo Morgan's book Mutant Message Down Under, it is the w-ite
men who are called Mutants because they were interbred with other ra-es,
and away from the "Ab-original." In ancient Egypt, the
`Ab' referred to that part of the person known as the
`heart' - therefore the Aboriginals can rightfully be called
`the original hearts' of the planet.

An analysis of DNA extracted from the ribs of a 29,000 year-old
Neanderthal infant buried in a cave in southern Russia showed that it
was too distinct to be related to humans. Although they evidently
co-existed, no evidence of genetic material being passed from
Neanderthals to modern humans can be found. The study of DNA taken from
the first Neanderthal skeleton found in the Feldhofer Cave in Germany in
1856 supports the theory that modern humans in fact replaced
Neanderthals. The DNA sequence from the infant was very similar to the
specimen from the Feldhofer Cave, suggesting both to be genuinely
Neanderthals, and that there was little diversity among them. DNA
comparisons also showed that different ethnic groups have no proven
links to any of the Neanderthals known.

The Nine say that the Neanderthals were a species ev-lved from the
planet Earth, but even they were "remnants of groups that had once
come before." Of course, the slowness and lack of progression of the
Neanderthals over 100,000 years tends to put a damper on evoluti-nary
theory considering how much progress modern man has seemingly made in as
short a time as the past 3,000 years.

The Nine also say that the Cro-Magnon's were from another rac- which
then merged with other species who had survived, later merging again to
bring humans to a more elevated state.

"The Neanderthals were not the beginning of humankind . . . their
first appearance was in the Tarim basin in Aksu."

         There is no demonstrated relationship between the
Neanderthals and those who also came to share space with them for a few
millennia: Homo Sapiens Sapiens (Human the Wise). These were
anatomically modern folk who appeared seemingly out of nowhere, leaving
remnants all the way from Europe to Australia. They were a people who
had sculpture, musical instruments, lamps, trade, and innovations such
as objects of symbolic significance communicated through visual images.

Palden Jenkins commentary in The Only Planet of Choie makes light of
the obvious questions left by science's haphazard explanation of
human life on this planet:

"After an evol-tionary struggle lasting millions of years, our
species emerged as top hominid. And then, in one spectacular moment, we
became human. As recently as 35,000 years ago, Western Europe was still
occupied by Neanderthals, primitive Beings for whom art and progress
scarcely existed. Then there was an abrupt change. Anatomically modern
people appeared in Europe and suddenly so did sculpture, musical
instruments, lamps, trade and innovation. Within a few thousand years
Neanderthals were gone. Insofar as there was any single moment when we
could be said to become human, it was at the time of this great leap
forward some 35,000 years ago."
Jenkin's conclusion is that scientific theories seem to rely heavily
for their continued survival "on the implicit lack of interest"
most people show in the subject, and a willingness to leave the question
to "experts." As said before, a seemingly very uncurious bunch,
aren't we?

Most of the world's different -aces and major cultural language
groups have come into place only since about 10,000 BC. Even Egyptian
civilization suddenly seemed to appear all at once, and almost fully
developed, somewhere in the fourth millennium BC. Egypt moved straight
from a stage of pre-civilization to the go-ernment of large areas
without the usual era of city states intervening. The simple logic of
historical development does not seem to apply to Egypt.

The Nine say that S-ul first came to the planet when reasoning began
with the assembling of tools and with the forming of a method of
communication, but others in the Universal Spiritual Hierarchy tend to
suggest it is much further back than we think. They are not disagreeing,
it is only that the higher you go, the bigger the picture one can see.

". . . We learn too," say the Nine.

       That is why we must take a look at the star seeding done by the
twenty-four Universal civilizations which took place in Aksu, as well as
that which occurred in the great empires of Lemuria and Atlantis,
civilizations which were colonized from other planets, in order to get a
better feel for our own history. Lemuria and Atlantis we shall deal with
in the forthcoming chapters. Aksu shall be dealt with now.

Before we begin, it must be mentioned first that prior to any of these
more famous civilizations there were the ra-es known as the Polarans and
the Hyperboreans both in varying stages of corporeality. When you
start to go back too far into our history you begin to talk about a
different level of existence from that which we now currently know and
can imagine. In as much, therefore, these rac-s are not a direct part of
the Tree of Life we are tracing in this book. Just know that, after the
Els, and as far back as four million years ago, there were great
civilizations upon the planet which rose and then fell, leaving behind
no trace of themselves due to the major physical changes which have
occurred on the planet since that time. The only memory of them exists
in the various myths and legends from around the world, and in the
Akashic Records of the planet. Some p-ychically aware people are able to
tap into these records. Always be aware, however, of the level of the
source from which this information comes.

Part 3.

John Winston.  johnfw@mlode.com