Subject: Disclosure.           Part 2. 
April 7, 2011.

  This person thinks that Bin Laden was actually killed lately and not
about 6 of 8 years ago.  I don't know what happened.

.........................................................
.........................................................

University Prof Calls for Congressional UFO Hearing
http://www.aolnews.com/2011/04/21/university-prof-bill-wickersham-calls-for-congressional-ufo-hear/
Citing findings from a 12-year-old groundbreaking French UFO study,
University of Missouri-Columbia psychologist and adjunct professor of
peace studies Bill W-ckersham has issued a call for cong-essional leaders
to boldly go where their predecessors wouldn't.
So does Wi-kersham think there's a real chance that a new congr-ssional
hearing on UFOs might actually come to pass in the current pol-tical
climate? "Not right now," he said. "And what's more, look at what
happened to [2008 Ohio De-ocratic pr-sidential candidate] Dennis
Kucinich.
The giggle factor, the ridicule, the ignorance, the apathy, denial -- all
these things that surround this issue. It takes a lot of g-ts for a 
poli-ician
[to speak out on UFOs]. Most polit-cians run from it."

                                      THEN COMES THE N-A

On the very same day Professor Wick-rsham called for open Con-ressional
hearings, the NS- released 42 UFO-related documents on their own official
website. KABOOM!
Though the bottom of the page says "Date Posted: January 15, 2009,"
many different media sources reported that this page either appeared or at
least got major new updates as of April 21, 2011 -- a mere ten days after 
the
F-I documents had emerged.
http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/declass/ufo/index.shtml
http://divinecosmos.com/images/image/nsa_disclosure.jpg

IS THE -SA OPENLY ADMITTING THAT MESSAGES FROM ET'S WERE
RECEIVED AND DECRYPTED?

Most people, including those in the m-dia, automatically gravitated to the
bottom of the N-A's list -- where documents related to ET messages appear.
At first blush, it appears that genuine messages had been received -- and
this was being openly acknowledged:

Official Disclosure? NS- Document Admits ET Contact

http://www.ufodigest.com/article/official-et-disclosure-nsa-document-admits-et-contact-kevin-w-smith

On October 21, 2004, the N-A approved for release to the public a portion of
their NS- Journal Vol. XIV No. 1.

This is a report of a presentation given to the -SA by Dr. Howard Ca-paigne
regarding the decoding of extraterrestrial messages that had been received
from outer space.
Apparently, these messages had actually been received via the Sputnik
satellite, but no one had any idea how to decode them at the time.
At some time, unspecified in the document, Dr. Howard Camp-igne and
some other -SA super mathematicians in the crypto department had
been given the task of decoding the messages. There were a total of
29 messages to be decoded, quite an undertaking.
It is curious, to say the least, that this document was cleared for release
on October 21, 2004.
Why was that?
Because the N-A did not release it into public information until April 21,
2011.
Though cleared for release, the -SA had been stonewalling it along with
hundreds of other N-A documents about contact with UFOs and
extraterrestrials -- until they lost the lawsuit brought by Peter Gers-en,
a lawyer from Arizona.
When they well and truly lost, the judge's order had to be carried out - and
the documents had to be released.

WERE THEY REAL, OR ONLY 'PRACTICE?'

Part of creating a good story, and avoiding panic by allowing the
skeptics to feel like they have won 'points', is to put things out there
that appear credible -- only to have further investigations pull them
apart.
People writing about these 'leaks' get excited, publish their findings and
are then embarrassed when the skeptics dig deeper and find out that
there was a prosaic explanation.
This was one of those cases -- but remember, we're still only talking
about two examples out of a set of 42 different documents.

                                    NSA ET Signals Only Practice

http://www.openminds.tv/nsa-practices-deciphering-et-signals-668/
On April 21, 2011 the National S-curity Agency posted documents
from their Technical Journal which had some interesting articles about
extraterrestrials.
Some have assumed that these documents were pertaining to messages
received from extraterrestrials, an easy mistake to make with article
titles such as Key to the Extraterrestrial Messages.
These documents are actually related to exercises for practicing
deciphering coded messages that extraterrestrials may send us in the
future.
However, there is still a story here, because these exercises were
started by a prominent NS- cryptologist who believed more attention
needed to be given to the investigation of UFOs and the possibility
that we may be contacted soon.

                            THE DOME OF THE ROCK SIGHTINGS

So far, the NS- documents have not received as much attention as the FB-
documents did. However, I have been through enough of them to see that
this is anything but a non-event.
After the NSA released its documents, other articles emerged regarding an
apparent UFO sighting at the Dome of the Rock. This, of course, is the most
hotly-contested religious area on Earth -- as it is a sacred site for Jews,
Christians and Muslims alike.
 Three Dome of the Rock UFO Videos Compared

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1378901/The-Dome-flying-saucer-Rock-Mystery-UFO-seen-Jerusalem-holy-site.html

European insiders told me there were no actual UFOs involved in this 
incident.
These are fakes -- structured to look good on first blush, but able to be 
pulled
apart after further analysis.
These videos are apparently being produced by the R-ckefeller / New W-rld
Order faction, which is desperately trying to destabilize the Middle East --  
as
a last-ditch effort to secure enough money to continue operating in the face 
of
worldwide opposition.

                    GET EVERYONE BELIEVING IT WAS THE END TIMES

The hope was that these videos would get Muslims thinking the Mahdi -- the
Islamic Messiah -- was coming.
Within Muslim prophecy, this would of course mean they were in "End Times"
-- and it could potentially embolden them to take r-volutionary action, 
since
P-radise was now at hand -- whether they lived or d-ed.
These rev-lutions, as former Forbes east-west editor Benjamin F-lford and
others have indicated, are being deliberately instigated in a last-ditch 
attempt
to create "regime change" and increase o-l revenues.
The Roc-efeller faction has been the single strongest element opposing
Disclosure all along. The rest of the world has ganged up on them -- which 
is a
huge story I have been covering for some time.
Now, we are seeing more and more signs of their impending defeat.
Some of them are not at all obvious -- at least not yet.

                                       THE BIN LADEN STORY

When I spoke to key insiders about Bin Laden, I fully expected to hear that
he had di-d a long time ago -- either in a firefight in December 2001, or of
kidney failure in 2002 or 2003.
These rumors are so persistent that they appeared in a recent Daily Mail
article as well.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1382828/Osama-Bin-Laden-dead-picture-White-House-NOT-release-gruesome-photo.html
The internet is abuzz with claims that Bin Laden died long ago perhaps of 
liver
or kidney failure, perhaps k-lled in the allied assault on the Afghan Tora 
Bora
mountains in 2001, perhaps a-sassinated at some other time.
The argument goes that his body was kept hidden, and his d-ath a s-cret, so
that America could justify the continuation of the W-r on Terror, along
with billions in mi-itary expenditure. Only now, some suggest, has America
decided it is time to announce his de-th, along with an elaborate 
cover-story.
Some were even suggesting yesterday that the news was suddenly released
to divert attention from evidence-less claims that Barack O-ama was not born
in America, so is not lawfully pr-sident.

      IT WAS REALLY HIM? YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME...

I was admittedly shocked -- if not disappointed -- to hear from very 
credible
sources that, in fact, this really was Bin Laden. The Osama Bin Laden -- not
a stand-in. Come on, you have GOT to be kidding me.
Are we ever going to see a picture to confirm this? Maybe and maybe not.
Apparently, the problem with releasing the photograph is that there is a
anteloupe-sized piece of his head missing in the region of the left eye
-- and it is extremely horrific to look at.
Even if this picture was released, many people would refuse to believe it.
There is no such thing as irrefutable evidence anymore. Everything can
be questioned -- and there is no limit to how far you can go with it.
I was told that if they hadn't buried the body within a day, the entire
Muslim world would have been infuriated -- and this would have created
very significant danger for Western nations.
I was also told that if they had buried him anywhere on land, a shrine would
have been created there and it would have further solidified his legacy
as a martyr -- which also would have increased the risk.
"Unless you've lived in the Middle East and really spent some time there, 
you
can't understand how powerful and prevalent these customs really are,
David."

WHAT THE HECK WAS HE STILL DOING ALIVE -- GIVEN EVERYTHING
WE'VE HEARD?

Part 2.

John Winston.  johnfw@mlode.com