Subject: The David I. Newletter.  Part 2. 
May 15, 2011.

  Here is mentioned so-called "Pat Down" done in airports.

...........................................................
...........................................................

He said in another interview on the show  since the fake 's-ooting' that Bin
Laden had d-ed soon after 9/11 from Marfan syndrome, an hereditary d-sease
which can seriously affect the connective tissue that holds the body 
together
and so distort the workings of many body systems, including the skeleton,
eyes, heart and b-ood vessels, nervous system, skin and lungs. Bin Laden
certainly showed classic traits of Marfan syndrome with his tall body, long
limbs and face.

P-eczenik said he could confirm the Dubai hospital story and that Bin Laden
needed constant dialysis because of Marfan syndrome. This was also why the
closest person to him was a p-ysician, he said.

Pieczenik pointed out that Colonel Tommy Franks, who led the US/UK invasion 
of
Afghanistan in 2001, stated (though he didn't mean to) that Bin Laden was 
de-d
at that time. 'We knew that was true',  said insider Pieczenik.
I'll come back to Steve Pi-czenik later when we ask the 'why now?' 
question -
why now do they suddenly claim to have  ki-led Bin Laden? On that, I 
suggest, he
is way out for whatever reason.
From the fact that Osama bin Laden was  dea- maybe a decade ago it is easy
to see why the official story of his sho-ting by 'Navy Seals' near a 
mi-itary
establishment in Abbottabad, Pakistan, has been such a ridiculous, hilarious
and constantly changing stream of l-es.

It never happened.

This is why his body was never shown to the public, but instead immediately
'buried at sea' according to a 'Muslim  custom' that doesn't exist and why
no photographs have been released on the 'pre-ident's orders' because they 
are
'too gruesome' and because 'you know, we don't trot out this stuff as 
trophies'.
Actually, that's exactly what 'we' do when we have the pictures or when 'we'
have fake pictures we think will f-ol the people. Unfortunately for 'we', 
there
is now a massively expanding alternative media that won't allow such fakes
to go unnoticed or unchallenged any more.

The fake 'd-ad Bin Laden' picture below  circulated immediately after 
Oba-a's
announcement of the 'sho-ting' on the key Satanic ritual day of May 1st and 
was
published by many in the mainstream media as genuine.

When it proved to be a Photoshop fake of the two pictures on the left 
combined
to produce the one on the right, the media said that it was the work of
'cons-iracy theor-sts' when it was the 'con-piracy theorists' who had been
exposing it as a fake.

We were told by the gove-nment that Bin  Laden was armed and there was a
sho-tout with the Navy Seals as he used his wife  as a human shield. Then 
the
same go-ernment had to admit that he wasn't armed and did not hide behind
his wife or anyone else. We were told that his wife had been k-lled and then 
that
she was still alive.
'No, no, you can't say the wife is de-d - we need her to be still alive so 
she
can support our story. Say we made a mistake in the fog of w-r.'

But perhaps the most outrageous attempt at misleading the public perception 
of
what happened was the now famous, it will be infamous, picture of O-ama,
Hillary C-inton and others staring anxiously at  apparently live images of 
Bin
Laden being ki-led. 'We got him', the little boy in short trousers is 
supposed
to have said.

Ah, but there is one little detail to know here. It has since been admitted
that there were no live images of the 'k-lling' and so these people could
not have been anxiously watching them.  So what were they watching?? The
wall?
The lies are unbelievable and the mainstream media just goes on repeating
them without question.
The W-ite House comedy show also said  that they had found a 'treasure 
trove'
of information and 'home videos' at the  'Bin Laden compound'. No they 
didn't,
because he wasn't there. What they 'found' was whatever they made up
themselves a long, long way from the  'compound'.
We are now in an era of computerised imagery where we can no longer claim
that what we think we are seeing is actually what we are seeing. Look at the
video after this article headed 'Gov-rnment released videos: You think your
eyes are seeing what you think they're seeing? Think again'.
The C-bal have had this technology for decades produced by the se-ret
projects and 'Bin Laden' videos galore have been released since his dea-h to
fuel the lie that he was still alive and active.  They have been 'acquired'
and released to the media through C-A/Mossad front organizations like
SITE or 'Search for International T-rrorist Entities' (but  never in 
Israel).

Katz and Venzke: Tooth  Fairy Videos SITE is run by an extreme Roths-hild
Z-onist called Rita K-tz, the daughter of an exe-uted Israeli s-y, and is
funded by the US gov-rnment to the tune of a reported $-00,000 a year.
It is, in effect, an arm of the Depart-ents of 'Justice', Treasury, and
Homeland Security.  SITE works in harness with an orga nization called
IntelCenter, another releaser  of 'Bin Laden' videos, which is headed by
another Ro-hschild Zio-is t, Ben Ven-ke.
It was Rita Kat- and SITE who 'reported'  this week that 'Al-Qaeda' had
made a statement confirming Bin Laden's d-ath. Or, as the pathetic CN-
put it: 'Al Qaeda released a statement on jihadist forums confirming the
de-th of its leader, Osama bin Laden, according to SITE Intelligence Group,
which monitors mi-itant messages.'

No - which circulates lies and fake videos under the direction of Mossad and
the C-A, among others, no  doubt.

'Excuse me, sir, do you  want a house or a rock behind him ...?'

Even the Washington Post revealed that the CI- was making fake videos to
discredit its targets. It reported that a video was made to apparently show 
Bin
Laden and friends drinking a-cohol around a campfire and talking about their
'conquests of little boys'.
But, really, you would think they could do better than the laughable 'home
video' footage they released last week to 'show' Bin Laden sitting on the 
floor
flicking through TV channels, all of which had his image on.

Have you ever flicked through a series of channels like that and never seen 
a
number of them showing advertisements? I haven't. But, no, it's just Bin 
Laden
everywhere. Maybe some of them were advertisements in which he starred. I
mean, Bin Laden vanishing cream would sell by the truckload.

There are, to employ understatement, just a few basic errors here that the
mainstream media has not allowed to take up good drinking time, but we 
should.
Firstly, all that we see in the entire footage is a hat, the side of a beard 
and
the tip of a nose.
The real Bin Laden is left-handed and yet this guy uses his right hand to
change the ch-nnels throughout. Close ups of the ears of fake and real Bin
Laden show they are not the same and other footage from the 'treasure trove'
is just pictures released years ago claiming to be new.

'New' footage found in the 'compound' that was circulating in 2007. They 
also
did the same in 2007 when the footage below was released as 'new' when it
was clearly the same video that had been circulating in 2002.

So to the question, why now? Why fake the  de-th of an already dea- man at
this time. The reasons are many and are already becoming obvious by current
actions and statements.

This is where I fundamentally depart from what insider Steve Pie-zenik said 
on
the Alex Jones Show and I can't believe that someone who has worked so 
closely
with so many major manipulators over many decades could be so naive and 
lacking
in understanding of what is really going on with regard to the big picture.

He seemed to be saying that the Bin Laden de-th was faked because Barack
Oba-a needed a serious boost to his public standing, given that he has been
such a disaster, and that Secr-tary of State, Hillary Cl-nton, and Chairman 
of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike M-llen, needed a 'victory' to cover up
their incompetence.

Has it been used to boost Ob-ma's standing? Absolutely it has, and it is no
coincidence that days after the fake 'kil-ing' there was a commemoration for
those who died on 9/11 at the Ground Zero site in New York where Ob-ma
contemptuously exploited 9/11 families, first responders and the Bin Laden
'kil-ing' to sell himself for another term in the Wh-te House in 2012.

This focus on O-ama as some sort of 'hero' for 'getting' Bin Laden is crazy
when, it turns out, he didn't make any decision to 'go in' even according to
the fake narrative. Of course, he didn't.  He does what he is told to do.

Piecz-nik claims far too much power for Oba-a personally and his plaudits 
for
Fa-her Bu-h, a serial p-edophile and mass m-rderer, were just sickening to
hear - the same with his praise for Robert G-tes, the Defense Se-retary to
puppet warmongers B-y B-sh and Ob-ma.
So, yes, Oba-a is milking the '-illing' for his own approval rating, but is
that the only, or even nearly only, reason for what has happened? You must
be joking, and the more I heard of the Piecz-nik interview with regard to 
the
'why' the less credible he sounded to me.

Some of the many reasons for the Bin Laden hoax are:

1.) The excuse to say that because of the kil-ing there are likely to be
ter-orist reprisals and we have to impose more surveillance and Pol-ce State
controls in places like railways, shopping malls, department stores, hotels,
ch-rches and sports stadiums.

We were told immediately after the hoax  that they found evidence in the
'compound' of plans to derail US trains and  attack so-called 'soft targets
' - for that read 'we want to expand the Poli-e State into areas that we 
have
not been able to justify before'.

(See also, 'box-cutters' 'found' in houses in Afghanistan after 9/11; the
'hijacker's passport' 'found' near Ground Zero after the towers collapsed; 
and
Korans and 'flight manuals' 'found' at  locations allegedly related to the
'9/11 hijackers.)

David B-ehm (Ro-hschild Zi-nist), Chief Operating Officer of  S-curity USA
Inc, was straight out of the blocks telling C-S that to keep people safe 
after
the 'compound find' the soft targets need to be protected using, in effect,
airport-style s-curity including the se-ual molestation known as the
'pat-down'.

Part 2.

John Winston. johnfw@mlode.com