Subject C Jouranal. 
Aug. 20, 2011.

  Here is the latest from the C Journal.

..................................................................
..................................................................

 * Co=spiracy Journal *
8/19/11  #633
http://www.conspiracyjournal.com
Subscribe for free at our subscription page:
http://www.members.tripod.com/uforeview/subscribe.html
You can view this newsletter online at:
http://uforeview.tripod.com/conspiracyjournal633.html

Are you tired of the same-old stories from your local newspaper
or the generic "g-vernment approved" TV news? Are you sick of
being constantly force-fed inane stories about the private lives
of  celebrities or what obscene amount of money a popular sports
figure makes a month?  Well if that's how you feel, then it's
time to join thousands of others all over the world (and maybe
"worlds") with the number one weekly e-mail newsletter of
conspi-acies, UFOs, the paran-rmal, and everything else weird,
strange and frightening.  YES THAT'S RIGHT! Con-piracy Journal
is here once again to cure the sickness of ignorance,
disinformation and government cover-ups. So sit back and relax
because it's time for Cons-iracy Journal!

This week, Conspir-cy Journal takes a look at such hair-pulling
stories as:

- Aliens May Destroy Humanity to Protect Other Civilizations -
- Former U.K. UFO Project Chief Apologizes For 'Spin And Dirty
Tricks' -
- Reptilian Quest -
- Spir-ts on the Information Highway -
AND: Revealed: S-x Hormone Plan to Feminize Hi-ler

All these exciting stories and MORE in this week's issue of
CO-SPIRACY JOURNAL!

~ And Now, On With The Show! ~

NEW FROM CONSPIRA-Y JOURNAL

- HOW NOT TO BE NOTICED DEPARTMENT -

Aliens May Destroy Humanity to Protect Other Civilizations

Rising greenhouse emissions could tip off aliens that we are a
rapidly expanding threat, warns a report

It may not rank as the most compelling reason to curb
greenhouse gases, but reducing our emissions might just save
humanity from a pre-emptive alien attack, scientists claim.

Watching from afar, extraterrestrial beings might view changes
in Earth's atmosphere as symptomatic of a civilization growing
out of control - and take drastic action to keep us from
becoming a more serious threat, the researchers explain.

This highly speculative scenario is one of several described by
a N-sa-affiliated scientist and colleagues at Pen-sylvania State
University that, while considered unlikely, they say could play
out were humans and alien life to make contact at some point in
the future.

Shawn Domagal-Gol-man of Nas-'s Planetary Science Division and
his colleagues compiled a list of plausible outcomes that could
unfold in the aftermath of a close encounter, to help humanity
"prepare for actual contact".

In their report, Would Contact with Extraterrestrials Benefit
or Harm Humanity? A Scenario Analysis, the researchers divide
alien contacts into three broad categories: beneficial, neutral
or harmful.

Beneficial encounters ranged from the mere detection of
extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI), for example through the
interception of alien broadcasts, to contact with cooperative
organisms that help us advance our knowledge and solve global
problems such as hunger, poverty and di-ease.

Another beneficial outcome the authors entertain sees humanity
triumph over a more powerful alien aggressor, or even being
saved by a second group of ETs. "In these scenarios, humanity
benefits not only from the major moral victory of having
defeated a daunting rival, but also from the opportunity to
reverse-engineer ETI technology," the authors write.

Other kinds of close encounter may be less rewarding and leave
much of human society feeling indifferent towards alien life.
The extraterrestrials may be too different from us to
communicate with usefully. They might invite humanity to join
the "Galactic Club" only for the entry requirements to be too
bureaucratic and tedious for humans to bother with. They could
even become a nuisance, like the stranded, prawn-like creatures
that are kept in a refugee camp in the 2009 South African movie,
District 9, the report explains.

The most unappealing outcomes would arise if extraterrestrials
caused harm to humanity, even if by accident. While aliens may
arrive to eat, enslave or attack us, the report adds that people
might also suffer from being physically crushed or by
contracting dis-ases carried by the visitors. In especially
unfortunate incidents, humanity could be wiped out when a more
advanced civilization accidentally unleashes an unfriendly
artificial intelligence, or performs a catastrophic physics
experiment that renders a portion of the galaxy uninhabitable.

To bolster humanity's chances of survival, the researchers call
for caution in sending signals into space, and in particular
warn against broadcasting information about our biological make-
up, which could be used to manufacture weapons that target
humans. Instead, any contact with ETs should be limited to
mathematical discourse "until we have a better idea of the type
of ETI we are dealing with."

The authors warn that extraterrestrials may be wary of
civilizations that expand very rapidly, as these may be prone to
destroy other life as they grow, just as humans have pushed
species to extinction on Earth. In the most extreme scenario,
aliens might choose to destroy humanity to protect other
civilizations.

"A preemptive strike would be particularly likely in the early
phases of our expansion because a civilization may become
increasingly difficult to destroy as it continues to expand.
Humanity may just now be entering the period in which its rapid
civilizational expansion could be detected by an ETI because our
expansion is changing the composition of the Earth's atmosphere,
via greenhouse gas emissions," the report states.

"Green" aliens might object to the environmental damage humans
have caused on Earth and wipe us out to save the planet. "These
scenarios give us reason to limit our growth and reduce our
impact on global ecosystems. It would be particularly important
for us to limit our emissions of greenhouse gases, since
atmospheric composition can be observed from other planets," the
authors write.

Even if we never make contact with extraterrestrials, the
report argues that considering the potential scenarios may help
to plot the future path of human civilization, avoid collapse
and achieve long-term survival.

Source: Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/aug/18/aliens-destroy-
humanity-protect-civilisations

- MAKE THEM LOOK CRAZY DEPARTMENT -

Former U.K. UFO Project Chief Apologizes For 'Spin And Dirty
Tricks'
By Lee S-eigel

As the British National Archives continues to release UFO-
related documents, the former Ministry of Defense (MoD) UFO
Project chief is openly admitting to being part of what he
claims was a U.K. policy of ridiculing UFO reports and the
people who reported them.

The U.K. made public 34 previously-classified files, totaling
about 9,000 pages of documents covering the years 1985 to 2007.
For three of those years, 1991 to 1994, Nick P-pe was in charge
of the official MoD office.

"What's abundantly clear from these files is that, while in
public we were desperately pushing the line that this was of no
defense interest," Pop- told The Huffington Post. "We couldn't
say 'There's something in our air space; pilots see them;
they're tracked on radar; sometimes we scramble jets to chase
these things, but we can't catch them.' This would be an
admission that we'd lost control of our own air space, and
such a position would be untenable."

"Every time we got a report from a pilot, we were checking the
radar tapes. So it was an interesting sleight of hand. We were
telling the public we're not interested, this is all nonsense,
but in reality, we were desperately chasing our tails and
following this up in great detail," he added.

One file reveals how officials were afraid to be embarrassed if
the public learned that UFO research was hindered by a lack of
funds and higher priorities.

Another case, from 2007, took place in the vicinity of the
Channel Islands and involved a small commercial aircraft.

"The pilot and several of his passengers saw a UFO, which they
said was essentially a mile long," -ope recounted. "And several
other pilots saw it, but said, 'We're not going to report this.'
And here's the great little get-out-of-jail-free-card for the
MoD: Just by a matter of maybe a few hundred meters, it turned
out that this was in French air space, so MoD was given this
little get out to say, 'Well, it happened in French air space,
so it's not an issue for us.' Clearly, that was an absolutely
outrageous abrogation of responsibility."

A file from 1993 (while P-pe was chief of the UFO Project)
describes how European Union fundshad been wasted on a report
that included a theory that aliens had established a base in the
asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter.

It turns out that Po-e may have been directly involved with
this case.

"I'm a little bit apologetic about this because obviously, when
I was in MoD, I had to play this game myself. To really achieve
our policy of downplaying the UFO phenomenon, we would use a
combination of 'spin and dirty tricks.'

"We used terms like UFO buffs and UFO spotters -- terms that
mean these people are nut jobs. In other words, we were implying
that this is just a very somewhat quaint hobby that people have
as opposed to a serious research interest."

But Po-e said the ridicule policy went much further than that.

"Another trick would be deliberately using phrases like 'little
green men.' We were trying to do two things: either to k-ll any
media story on the subject, or if a media story ran, insure that
it ran in such a way that it would make the subject seem
ridiculous and that it would make people who were interested in
this seem ridiculous."

Pop- further admits that he may have been the one who drafted
actual MoD statements that contributed to the ridicule policy.

"If it was my words, then I apologize, I'm very sorry for that.
I believe in open g-vernment and freedom of information. I
believe that the UFO phenomenon does raise important defense,
national se-urity and air safety issues, and if I helped ki-l
any initiative on that, I'm deeply sorry."
'Part 1.

John Winston.  johnfw@mlode.com