Subject: More DK's Experiences Of Being Controlled.                 Nov. 22, 
2011.

  This probably should be called "DK's Experiences Of Being Contolled"
Part 5 but I will now call it "More DK's Experieces Of Being Controlled.

...............................................................
...............................................................

This is speculation, but it strikes me as a reasonable explanation of
why they chose to let me hear them. They were having second thoughts
about their participation in the mind-control experiment after hearing
me cu-sing them repeatedly and with an unexpected intensity. Maybe they
really did feel bad about it.
I am not sure they knew I could hear them, but it really seemed that
way. And it seemed like this was a somewhat improvised and unfamiliar
experience for them. One explanation could be that the regular mind
controllers, the ones who 'pressed the buttons', wanted to cover their
backs by having their peers participate actively.

Curiously, about a week after I wrote the lines just above, I read the
article Of C-nspiracies and Co-spiracy Theories: The Truth Buried by the
Fantasies by Robin R-msay in 1996, see the references.
There he actually says he has got written statements from 2 alleged mind
control victims, who claim to "hear..voices of teams of psychologists
and i-telligence personnel monkeying around with their brains."

(Robin Ra-say also says he has not yet seen any convincing evidence
that there are any people with implants.)

-----------------------------

In the mental hospital, I talked to some other people. Two said they
were d-ug addicts and they seemed genuine enough to me. One of
them told me, spontaneously, that p-lice recruites in a particular
swedish city would pick up drug addicts and transport them to a
place where they were experimented on, and this person also
expected me to be already informed about similar things. Since I
hadn't told anybody about anything of this nature ever, and since I
had never even hinted on the true reason why I was there, it
seemed strange that I would be expected to beleive such things. I
said I didn't beleive that such things happened, and I wondered if
that person was some kind of infiltrator/provocateur or whether
this only reflected the shocking realities of Sweden in the 1990's.

Later that year, the mind controllers, let me hear a female voice,
telling me something like: "You should watch out, we are very fed
up with you, and we can do much worse than this". I didn't know
exactly what she was referring to, since they hadn't been
particularly busy right then.
But with my previous experience, I didn't take this for an empty
threat.
The voice was talking in the local idiom, and I thought, that maybe
the mind controllers had recorded the voice of some local po-ice
officer and, probably against the regulations, let me hear it. (I am
not insinuating that such a po-ice officer would have to be involved
with the high-tech part of the mind-control operation, but I was being
surveyed at the time, and it didn't seem inconceivable that some
poli-e officers, who, most unwillingly, had to take some part in it,
could have felt that way.) Normally, the mind controllers avoided
that sort of obvious harassment, and preferred more easily deniable
methods, such as pinching me in the ear (simulating it in the brain),
when they thought I was trying to write some kind of code. I mean
when I wasn't writing simply formatted text on the computer, but
was fiddling around with the size and kerning of characters in a
nontrivial manner. Then they seemed to think that I was trying to
conceal something from them. It was obvious that they were able
to see everything I wrote on the computer instantly. Nothing of
this really surprised me. It seemed more like the Big Brother
manners, that you might expect.

I still have no idea why they started the whole thing. I have naturally
never been accused of anything. Only punished. But there are some
circumstances from back in 1983-84 or thereabout, when I actually did
something involving an electronic device that wasn't illegal, but that
nevertheless could have caused some suspicion and that later could
have been combined with other loose ends to arrive at some kind of
potential te-rorist profile. I want to emphasize that I have never
threatened anyone or ever had any intention to do any harm to
others. I am thinking that it might have been used as an excuse for
experimenting on me. If you combine several loose ends from a
persons life by breaking into his home, while he is gone and start
drawing superficial conclusions, without checking with the person
or anyone who knows him, you may easily come to very misleading
conclusions. I beleive this is what actually happened. Either the
po-ice or some 'vigilante' group broke into my home se-retely and
went through my posessions, and among other things they might
have found a box full of legal vitamine pills, that they may have
taken for d-ugs.
If they had taken a sample and had given it to some forensic chemical
analysis, the misunderstanding would have been sorted out.
Apparently this wasn't done, and instead, the loosely founded
suspicions were presented as facts, by somebody who was
considered a reliable source by the local p-lice.
There was also a syringe, which I used for lubrication and therefore
it was contaminated with o-l. Again a forensic chemical analysis
would have made it improbable that it was used for dr-gs.
I didn't throw any of the above-mentioned objects in the waste until
long after that, so there is no way they could have known about them
without breaking in.
I also had a small-caliber r-fle of fixed length, much to large to be
hidden in the bag I used to bring along when I went out, so it couldn't
have been the reason why the poli-e would expect me to be prone to
sh-ot at them. There was a case of a-munition and that particular
type of amm-nition was named 'Laser'. It wasn't a laser wea-on, it
was just arbitrarily named that way. Those who thought they found
dru-s in my home, may also have thought that they found a laser
we-pon.
At the time, I beleive the p-lice were chasing a person, known as the
'laser-man', who k-lled and maimed immigrants with a laser we-pon
and he got caught later. On the wall I had a cork-panel pinboard, on
which I would pin various notes. I had so many such unused pins
that I arranged them in the shape of a cross. When the cross reached
the pin board frame, there were still many unused pins left. So I put
the rest of the pins at an angle, which created a s-astika. It wasn't
intentional, it was just a convenient arrangement, so I let it remain
that way for quite a long time. But those who broke into my home
and thought they found dr-gs, may well have thought that the guy
living there had n-zi sympathies. A right-wing te-rorist who planned
to s-oot people with a laser wea-on and more. Could that be the
way they pictured me? This is how I thought about it, at the time,
when I was trying to understand on what grounds they chose me.

According to several sources there appears to be a pattern, where
e.g. right-wing e-tremists are subjected to mind control, and then
they are used as programmed ki-lers and as scapegoats for actions
that are in reality the work of the in-elligence agencies. The
preference for right-wing ext-emists is due to the expectancy, that
it will then be easier to gain wide acceptance for infringements on
const-tutional rights. But the general idea is to create the
impression that the perpetrator is acting on his own initiative and
that there is no consp-racy.

The m-rder of Olof P-lme appears to fit in with that pattern.

If you learn more about the post-w-r history from u-censored sources,
you will find things of that nature mentioned there. See the reference
list.

I have told you these details above because this illustrates why the
protection of peoples privacy, is considered so important by many. If
you don't know a person when you illegally break into his home, it may
lead to serious misunderstandings. When the poli-e has a search
warrant and openly enters a persons home, there is some room to
sort out such misunderstandings. But when there is never any open
accusation and everything is done in a deniable way, there is great
risk that everything runs out of control.
Issuing search warrants more easily will probably be viewed by many
as a development towards a t-talitarian state, but if the alternative
is to have them acting c-vertly, perfecting all sorts of deniable
methods, systematically covering up crimes commited in the process,
all silently approved by the authorities, ( 'no questions asked'
hypocritical mentality ), I prefer the former method, where you know
who you are dealing with.
I am not so much offended by individual polic- officers, 'improvising' a
bit when they try to recon on the bad guys, as I am offended by what I
suspect to be a hypocritical attitude among the people further up in the
system, who don't want to get dirt on their hands, but who don't give a
da-n about what's really going on, as long as it's deniable.

------------------------------

Part 1.

John Winston.   johnfw@mlode.com