Subject: More DK's Experiences Of Being Controlled.  Part 2.
Nov. 23, 2011.

  Here we find that not many people believe he had these
experiences.

......................................................
......................................................

Digression concerning the choice of mind-control victims:
Afterthought written later and inserted into the text, after having read
about the following phenomena:
  a.. So called 'alien abduction' of people, which by some is beleived
to be caused by special m-litary organizations, who abduct people in
order to have them experimented on under controlled conditions.
 See The Controllers by Martin C-nnon in the References.
b.. Certain official documents that existed some years ago contained
definitions of what kind of people could be considered s-ies and
therefore would be legitimate 'targets of electronic surveillance'. Such
people could then be used to experiment on electronically, using various
techniques. In practise, anybody could become a victim for this kind of
experimentation.
  c.. Deniability is a requirement.
  d.. There are methods for erasing memories and perhaps for implanting
false memories as well. The person could be made to forget everything
about the abduction, even if he has been awake during part of the
abduction period. If such false memories were implanted the person
wouldn't notice any missing time. It needn't be perfect, just good
enough to give the resemblance of having been at home during the
abduction period. Maybe it is possible to change the impression of
when a particular period of events actually took place, so that a
missing time period could be 'filled in' with events taking place
some months earlier. Who knows?
I make the following hypothesis:
The people who do these experiments are rational actors, and they are
guided mainly by scientific considerations plus deniability. Further, I
hypothesize that the experimenting generally involves implanting
electronic devices inside the heads of the victims. It is reasonable
that they need time to do a good job out of it and that the time
needed may be so long that in many cases, the victims chosen
could be missed by their relatives etc. Lets assume they would still
do it on such a person. This could work if the person were a d-ug
addict, a mental patient or a person without much contact with
other people. Under some conditions they could even have the victim
temporarily replaced by a look-alike to avoid suspicion. With a dr-g
addict people would be less suspicious if they perceived some
personality changes and it would be easier to replace such a person
for a while. But in any case it is obvious that lonely people would
be at greater risk to be chosen, since they could be abducted
without being missed by any close relation. By studying potential
victims for a prolonged period of time, it would be possible to
single out some individuals, who would pose the least risk of
arousing suspicion if they were gone for a while.
I would have made an excellent choice in that respect. Sometimes
I wouldn't talk to anybody for weeks. No phone calls, nothing. I
would read and I would go for walks, pondering over some
scientific problem.
At the most extreme period I didn't even listen to the radio for
months.
From this point of view it would seem possible that I were implanted
earlier than I previously thought. It would then be more likely that
I wouldn't be able to recall any period of time, when there could be
some missing time or when something would seem to be illogical
somehow.
-------------------
Note added later:
Some loose ends. Trying to find out what other excuses they may have
used.
  a.. When I was 4 years old my mother was divorced and we left Sweden
for Canada and stayed in Toronto for a year. I have no reason to beleive
that anything was done to me then, but maybe that background could
make a difference. When I left the school (all I remember was the Union
Jack), one teacher told my mother that I was bright, but that I would
have social problems later in life.
  b.. In 1982 I was present at a conference, where the main body of
topics treated was non-mi-itary, but I recall at least one scientist
presenting a paper on star-w-rs technology.
  c.. Before 1985, a person called the physics department, and told
somebody he wanted experts to help him investigate the origin of rays
that he claimed were beamed at him in his home, through the wall.
The call was transferred to me and I attentively listened to him. He
was very persistent, but I didn't find sufficient cause to doubt his
sanity.
No action was taken, but it did worry me a bit. At that time I knew
nothing about mind control.
  d.. On another occasion a person claiming to be persecuted by a
foreign int-lligence agency, wanted to join the department, but
wasn't accepted.
  e.. (The reader can skip this point without loosing continuity.)
In 1987, during my independent research, I was developing an
unorthodox theory (unpublished) of the human mind and a possible
connection with the external natural world, including interactions
between the suns electromagnetic field and various global patterns
on earth.
  I won't dwell on the details of that particular theory, but lately I
have learnt about some high-power electromagnetic experimenting
by the mili-ary with the athmosphere. And there is mention of
high-power long-wave radiofrequency being used for communication
with submarines and some say also for global mind control. I am
skeptic about the latter claim, but the problem area is clearly
actively persued by the milit-ry, and for this reason, it occurred
to me that if their surveillance, included studying my notes, at that
time, this might have given them some excuse to consider me
suspicious. (That is, if I was already targeted by some intel-igence
activity.)
-----------------
Around christmas-time 1998, I finally broke the silence. I had then
experienced torture with the brainimplant both during evening
courses, during lectures at C-almers Institute of Technology,
and during my work as a programmer. There didn't seem to be any
end to it and in addition, due to my increasing frustration I began
letting out some steam, by shouting very load as they were
torturing me in my bed in the night, thereby waking my little son
who was s-ared and c-ied. I could see no other way than to strive
for the maximum of publicity. There was no point in turning the
other cheek any longer. I had been very reluctant to tell anybody,
because I felt that once I begin, I will have to follow it through,
and I will probably have to struggle with people who are reluctant
to beleive me, and it seemed that it might take all my energy.

As this is written, a year has gone, since I began trying to reach out.
First I tried with the po-ice, and they told me I probably was afraid
that there wasn't any foreign object in my head, so I turned to a
D-ctor to get the necessary referral, and as long as she didn't know
the precise nature of my problems, she recommended a skilled
specialist, and would try to get me in there, but as I later explained
that I had been implanted and tortured, she turned away from me
and tried to redirect me to psychiatry, telling me that at the local
psychiatrics clinic, they were familiar with this kind of delusional
condition. I politely insisted on her explaining to me the details of
the similarity which she had implied, between my story and these
other patients, but she didn't answer. I assume this was because
she really didn't know anything about it and didn't bother to find out.
Due to these difficulties I decided it would be necessary to press
on for publicity, if I were to get any decent treatment. After many
months of writing letters and making phone calls, I have been
promised by both the radio and by the newspaper DN, that they
will let me through. Not until around october 1999, did I inform
myself about other cases of mind control. I only learned the term
then. Before that the only case, I had ever heard of was that of
Timothy M-Veigh, the person who got a d-ath sentence for the
Oklahoma City B-mbing. A couple of years ago, I heard on a TV
broadcast that Mc-eigh claimed to have an implant and that they
were using it to control him.
Something like that. Information relating to McVe-gh can be found
in:

The Oklahoma City Bombing and the P-litics of Te-ror. by David
H-ffman.

After having spent some days reading about the other people who
have experiences similar to mine, and realizing that these things
have never been touched by swedish m-dia, I felt very sad. I
realized that these med-a trust that they get reliable information
from the dominating news agencies, and they never really try to
get information from independent sources. Realizing this, I felt
that swedish journalists have a lot to learn if they are ever to be
able to bring the truth to the public.
Moreover, I also feel that they seem to lack in empathy. But maybe
I am wrong there.
It is frustrating to know that you have to fight so hard, just to get
a little attention. That they don't really care much for people who
don't have a position or any contacts. I mean who's side are those
journalists on? In Sweden the newspapers get enormous sums of
taxpayer's money just to keep those dragons barely alive. This is
supposed to guarantee an open debate. As I was reading
documents on the internet, I learned more about the general
problem of Nonconsensual Human Experimentation, where
mind-control experiments is only a small part and where apparently
wa- veterans have been subjected to unethical experimentation on
a large scale. I learned about the efforts towards a new legislation,
Human Research S-bject Protections Act of 1997, where Sen. John
G-enn was involved and about P-esident Bill C-inton's memo
concerning a policy for Strengthened Pro-ections for Human
Su-jects of Classified Research.
Now as I tried to direct the attention of swedish journalists to the
fact that the US Pre-ident had to direct his gov-rnment not to
make unethical experiments on US citizens, you would expect that
this would be considered to be an important information. But the
spontaneous reaction I got from a journalist with whom I spoke
only very briefly was as follows: "I don't know in what context Bill
Cl-nton said that." I am citing this, because I beleive it tells us
something about the general attitude of me-ia people towards
the public. It's not the sources we cite that counts, it's who we
are, what kind of relation we have been able to establish with
the m-dia. This is an entirely anti-intellectual attitude, and I can't
see how we can ever have an open debate as long as medi- people
treat the public with such disdain.

References - 1

References - 2

Part 2 of 2.

John Winston.   johnfw@mlode.com