Subject: Martin Luther King. Part 2.
From: "John Winston" <johnfw@mlode.com>
Date: 17/02/2012, 06:09
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.area51

Subject: Martin Luther King. Part 2.                                    Feb. 
16, 2012.

  This talks about the Course In M-racles.

.............................................................
.............................................................

SB: All right, lor-. Thank you for that. Readers have sent in
questions, and I feel obligated to ask you some of them. One
of them requires me to read a couple of paragraphs, and I
ask you to excuse me for that. Montague K-en published a
message recently saying that much of what has been said
about Israel and the Israelites actually pertains to the Irish.
And mk says there are still one or two of you who have not
yet grasped the importance of Ireland. He goes on to say
that the ten commandments of the ancient Irish truths are
almost identical to those given to Moses. The preservers and
disseminators of pre-diluvian knowledge were the Druids.
The Druids were A-yans. This means a s-iritual caste, not
a r-ce. Their languages were Aramaic and Hebrew. They
are not Semitic and were not invented by J-ws. The 22
letters of the ancient Irish alphabet were the s-cred
alphabet of the ancient Irish. Now they expect you to believe
it is Hebrew. Everything was stolen from Ireland, the Irish
people. Judeo-C-ristianity is but a result of deliberate
plagiarism.

I've been asked to ask your comment on that, please.

J: Well, it is a night of controversy, is it not?

SB: Yes, indeed.

J: I will be pleased to answer this. And it is important that
people know.
First of all, when I come to speak to you, I am interested in
what you think and what you feel - you, the collective. And
so I am pleased when I hear or receive questions from
readers or writers. But let us not mistake what we are
doing here as a review of history. What we are doing together
is building the future. What we are doing is entering into
partnership. We are laying the foundation and building
actually the structure, that golden spiral through which
each of you are ascending.

When we have spoken of universal law and universal law
that pertains above and below, that is basically what your
ten commandments and the ten commandments that were
developed pertain to. And there are variations in every
culture, for there are rules and laws that pertain to sloth,
to stealing, to thievery, to murder, to mayhem, to lust, to
greed. There are many truths that have been in the Irish
history, in the ancient ways of Ireland. I would have no
reason to deny that or to challenge that. But to suggest
that the history or the development of the Judaic tradition
has been based on theft - I think this is a little overboard,
do you not?

SB: Well, it certainly did sound radical to me, that;s for
sure.

J: It is the need. Again, we are going back to the need.

And whether it is of an individual or a group, it is this deep desire
to be acknowledged as important, to be acknowledged as
unique, to be acknowledged as divine. That is not a problem.
The d-vinity of the ancient Irish, of the Druids, of the Egyptians,
of the Hathors - beings - is always beyond question. But it
is not a contest. The law is - is -. And it has been understood
and translated in many universes. So it was not a ra-e, and
it was not a theft. It was a gift.

SB: All right, Lord. Thank you. I'd like to read you another
passage that is controversial and ask your comment on it.

The truth about Chr-stianity is it is based upon fabrications
about Je--s's birth, crucifixion and resurrection. And his
teachings were deliberately distorted through dilution and
omission. J--us was conceived and born just like every
other baby, and he was never put on a cross. He was flogged
by the Sanhedrin, who ruled c-urch and state, and was
banished. They wanted him out of that land, not [to] make
him a martyr whose de-th would increase the numbers of his
followers. But with his pregnant wife, Mary Ma-dalene, --sus
went back to the east where he had gone as a youth and
spent may years studying with the master teachers.

Could you -- would you care to comment on that, please?

J: I guess I could say that it is wishful thinking and that it
is certainly distorted thinking, or distorted c-anneling or
understanding. Yes, I am born. And we have discussed how
that has taken place by the ignition of light, of h-ly sp-rit,
of the energy of creation within what you think of as a
virgin womb. Did I assume a human form? Yes, I most
certainly did. And I have had human experiences. But
also what I have shared with thee is that I have also been
filled with the light of the Ho-y Spi-it and overlit at a very
early age, so that sense of knowing, that privilege of
connection, not being in the, what I would call the
illusion that had penetrated so much of the human rac-,
was not part of my reality.

I've been flogged many times, more than I would choose
to remember. For justice was not always within the courts,
and there were many who thought one way to tame me
was to throw stones or flog or jeer. Or yes, even
sometimes, to call my teachings or what I believed to be
a hoax. There were many who wished I would go into
exile. And there were certainly moments when that was,
as a human alternative, very attractive. But that was
not the path or the agreement.

So no, I did not travel with my beloved wife to the east.
Had I studied with ma-ters? Yes. And I was privileged
to do so. And in some small way that seed and that
exchange of energy contributed to all who were part
of those conversations.

You may have wondered when last we spoke why I
was so hesitant to say names or places, or who did
what, but it was - one of the reasons was that I do
not wish people to say, well, he was a student of, or
a follower of, and then try and dilute what I have to
teach and what I have to say. There are many, many
ma-ters that have wisdom and love to share. There are
certainly enough to go around. But there is no need
to make fantasy out of what occurred in my lifetime.

Did I die? Was I crucified? Yes. And it was far from
what many people have thought of as h-ly or s-cred.
It was painful, humanly painful, and at moments
spi-itually painful. But each of you have also known
moments of extreme pain, either in your heart or
your body, your mental or emotional fields. I am
not unique in that way, do not need to lessen it. So
no, let us be done with this mythology of the great
escape once and for all.

SB: All right, lo-rd. Thank you. There are a cluster
of questions about what happened following your
crucifixion.
By that I mean who went to France.
Could you give us more details of the life of your
daughter Sarah in France?
Did Joseph - well, I've already said who went to
France.
So could you give us a little bit more detail about
what happened to Mary and Sarah and the others
who went with her to France?

J: Yes. My wife and Sarah, James, my brother
Joseph, and a retinue of disciples who would attend
to the family went to France. Andrew as well. The
life was -
SB: There in France

J: - very simple, and very quiet. The Magda-ena in
many ways retreated. But Sarah did not, for she
moved amongst the people, and she embraced
them. And they embraced her as well. And she is
the one who carried the lineage.

SB: Is there anything we should know about the
lineage, Lor-? Is that a subject that would be
profitably explored?

J: No. Because there is too much time and too much
interest, although it is a fascinating subject, is it
not?

SB: Yes.

J: But many wish to know who was where when,
and so I would ask each of you, where were you?
Do you remember being with me as we walked
those shores, as we trod those dusty, dusty roads?
Those paths, those goat paths, really.
And then too many are willing to say, well, I was
there, I was there at the flogging or the crucifixion,
or I was this apostle or that apostle. And in most
causes you are absolutely correct, you were. But
that is not the issue.

The issue is as those beings you have chosen to come
back right now during the fulfillment of the promise.
In some ways, the plan was evol-ed, born, long before
I ever walked the Earth.
That is most certain and clear. But some think of it as
the birth of the promise. You can think of it that way
or not. I certainly came to simply remind people about
their potential for love. But now, you who are living in
a very different world that is absolutely no different,
you are the fulfillment of the promise.
And yes, I tell you, aside from myself, that all of you
have returned, and as you ascend into the fifth or the
seventh, that I will walk with you again. Many of us
will. But most of you are already there.

Now, I do not mean to imply that this is simply a rerun.
It is not, because there has been such ev-lution. And
there have been some steps forward and some steps
backward. But you have persisted, each of you, in
your own way, whether you were centurion or governor,
judge, apostle, handmaiden. You have said, - I will go
again, and I will keep going until this promise is fulfilled.
- That is why you are here.

SB: Thank you, L-rd. Another reader has asked, if you
were the source of the Course in Mi-acles - I think
they want to hear it from your own lips - is there
anything you'd like to say about that project and your
connection with it? I'm sure our listeners would be
interested in anything you want to share about the
Course in Mira-les.

J: I was a full participant, let me put it that way. Yes,
I am a source for that.

Part 2.

John Winston.   johnfw@mlode.com