Patty, are you still here, or should I ask, WHY are you still here.
Your palsey-wellsey Wider Sham has left, good riddance to
bad rubbish.  Now it's your turn to do a stage left!

Honest researchers, like myself, have had enough
of useful idiots, debunkers, trolls, bums, deviants,
slobs, nitwits, imbeciles and nincompoops like yourself.

"We" are taking back this newsgroup, "we" are
restoring democracy and "we" are going to
throw turth-terrorists like you and yours into nice neat
re-education resorts so you can change your ways.

No, it won't be easy and it may not be nicey-nicey,
but it MUST be done and it SHALL be done,
thus it WILL be done.  He HATH spoketh!

Now be a good debunker and go snort your swamp gas,
and report to room 782-B at Redstone Arsenal in
Huntsville at 0800 hours tomorrow.  

Disssssmisssssed!!!
= = = =
1. Dummy up. If it's not reported, if it's not news, it didn't happen.

2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the "how dare you?" gambit.

3. Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors." If,
in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about
the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors."

4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspect of the weakest
charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors
and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real
and fanciful alike.



In article <0udcfv0pagdv6sbnas5o2k92capqj4hda1@4ax.com>, David Patrick says...

On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 15:47:02 GMT, Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:

Practice debunkery-by-association. Lump together all phenomena
popularly deemed paranormal and suggest that their proponents
and researchers speak with a single voice. 

Pot Kettle Black yet again, Flaffer.

It doesn't help your case that you continually try to do all the dirty
little tricks you accuse us of all the time.

Why not stop bashing 'debunker's and actually discuss cases for once?

I accept you can't give any opinion on any case so why not go to
groups.google.com and show us one link, just one link, where you have
discussed in depth a UFO or alien case with someone else.

Can't do that either? What a surprise.


David Patrick