| Subject: Re: Out Of The Blue: on the Sci-Fi channel |
| From: nyceddie@webtv.net (E. L.) |
| Date: 26/06/2003, 22:39 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo |
You criticize my POV then you support it with your own assessments!
Cont'd below.
Re: Out Of The Blue: on the sci-fi channel Group: alt.alien.visitors
Date: Wed, Jun 25, 2003, 11:09pm (EDT-2)
From: hensle@ix.netcom.com (Harold Ensle)
E. L. <nyceddie@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:4987-3EF9E36A-78@storefull-2375.public.lawson.webtv.net... "As with
all UFO documentaries this 2-hour doc. had its good and bad moments. The
bad moments were the interviews, mostly old b.s., and the good moments
were the ones including the footage, some of it possibly never shown
before although it's a 2002 documentary.
e.l."
Your usual poor judgement I see.
el: "My "usual poor judgement"? If you were half as smart as I am you
wouldn't recognze your thinking."
This was unlike many documentaries and I was surprised at some of the
documents and witnesses they managed to include.
el: "You surprise easily."
This really was one of the best documentaries I've seen.
el: "You ain't seen many then."
There are a few details that should probably be mentioned. They had good
witnesses for the Pheonix case, but they failed to explain that the
video-taped lights were, in fact, flares.
el: "The "good witnesses" should have been able to explain the lights as
flares. Otherwise they were not good witnesses."
However, the witnesses clearly described a different series of events,
which preceeded the video tape by hours. I don't know why no documentary
has ever been able to sort this out properly.
"It has been done many times. Usually, they mention the triangle that
some claim they saw and when the video of this triangle is included you
can see that the triangle is a bunch of planes flying in a loose
triangular formation at regular speed."
Corso is, of course, a complete lunatic, but fortunately, he was never
given the opportunity to ruin the documentary with any of his ridiculous
claims.
el: "The fact that he was included at all took up valuable space."
Other than that, the show really was great. It remained focused on
credible cases and brought up good evidence.
H.Ellis Ensle
el: "As I said, good and bad. But it definitely was an overlong,
not-that-great documentary. Even at an hour, it would have been less
than great."