| Subject: HELP WANTED--Credible UFO Debunkers!!//ASAP! |
| From: Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. |
| Date: 29/06/2003, 12:44 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct |
WANTED: Credible UFO Debunkers!
To those concerned:
Please, please, please send us some credible UFO debunkers.
We have never asked and will never ask for great debunkers,
we will never even ask for even good debunkers.
All we have really asked for is someone who is just a little bit coherent
enough to make a sound counter-argument. Somebody who understands
what an alien implant is, what a crop-impression is, how
downed extraterrestrial craft have been back-engineered for 55 years and
somebody who has a working knowledge of the alien phenomenon.
Perhaps somebody who has interviewed multiple witnesses of
extraterrestrial crafts and has done some of their own investigations.
We only have asked for someone who is not strung-out
on "swamp gas" or has a serious relation with a
"time compressed crash-test dummy!" Why can't debunkers
intelligently discuss crop circles with telling us how they have
"crapped" in circles, or discuss alien abductions
without dee-bunkers discussing how their brains
have been abducted. Why oh why do they always have
to make "copy-cat" posts like Wanted: Credible
UFO Believers when it is obvious that the study of
the extraterrestrial presence is NOT a belief system
but based on a massive amount of scientific evidence.
All we have left on these alien newsgroups are
total nincompoops, complete imbeciles, uninteresting liars,
low-level spOOks and delusional paranoids.
So please-please send us some credible UFO debunkers,
and occasionally rotate the low-level spOOks (Echelon);
crack-pots (Davis, Shipley); delinquents (George, Chumpest);
half-wits (Wilson, Patrick) and buffoons (Twit, ASF-Wipe)
for some person with an IQ above 5!
Is that too much to ask? WELL IS IT??
- - - - - -
The Star Man added this:
I'm of the mind that we should not even waste time with ANY debunkers.
They obviously have an agenda that is counter to that of ufologists.
Part of this agenda is to keep us busy arguing with them.
I contend that we ignore such feeble attempts to sway us from our goal
which should be to disseminate the truth and what little evidence we
have amongst the general populace. In doing this, we allow the people
who want to know to have the evidence, these people will in return
spread the information even further telling more and more people. The
people who do not want to know will forget about it. The people who
don't want anyone to know will tie us up in circular arguments and
useless prattle about the invalidity of our work. Ignore them or you
do their work for them.
Stark alien
- - - - -
Jos X expounded:
I don't think there is a sensible debate possible on the aliens because
1. Science has long since decided it will debunk this issue.
Going back to an open-ended debate will involve admitting by science
it has emotionally jumped to conclusions for over half a century.
2. The general population isn't confronted with UFO's or aliens or
crop-circles or abductions or whatever on a daily basis. The population
at large has no motivation to be interested, and you could say they are
right, and that more pressing matters exist, there hasn't been a mass
landing so.... Saying "they don't exist" can be interpreted as "they
don't exist in my life"... "so I ignore them for the time being if you
don't mind".
3. The evidence is not conclusive enough to be indisputable. After the
debunking-campaign, the level of evidence needed is also much higher
than for any other matter: for instance, retrieving an alien body,
or retrieving an live UFO isn't going to be enough anymore, because
everyone will ignore it as a hoax.
So, until we have a mass landing, or aliens staying on the planet on
TV for a serious amount of time (perhaps years), and many people are meeting
them openly over a multiple meetings, the general population is not going
to believe they exist (i think).
4. There is the matter of emotionally not being able to get to grips with
the reality of aliens. Complicating matters are that they are more
advanced (possibly), and that humanity is apparently not the pinnacle
of evolution all of a sudden. Additionally, there is fear of losing
the planet if these aliens are superior in technology, and perhaps
there is even fear of losing the power to manipulate fellow humans
when these aliens turn out to be telepathic (among criminal and
scam-oriented people) maybe(?).
Then there is the matter of racial hatred among humanity, which
possibly will be projected unto aliens as well (it is different,
it must be bad), also not very inviting for aliens.
When will the truth be known? Beats me, but not tomorrow I�d say.
Jos