| Subject: Re: What's with the massive decrease in debunking all about//EXPLAINED! |
| From: Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. |
| Date: 30/06/2003, 05:22 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct |
In article <JQMLa.5191$MO2.3869@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net>, nospam says...
"Th� Wh�l�fl�ff�r ���ti���m" <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote
Hughe/Sucke is your standard troll,
ignore this Cult of Useful Idiot members.
Hugh, Patty, Anal-Sham, Sludge, UBob, Wilson,
George, Chumpust are here to disrupt these newsgroups.
Not one of them has done any real research on the alien presence
and their knowledge on the subject is zero. Although their knowledge
on deviant perverted behavior is absolute, but that's another story.
You know what's strange?
You, but I have a strong feeling your going to "claim" its me!
That you who claim to promote genuine research into
UFO phenomena are the main culprit, on all of the newsgroups to which you
post, of promoting divisive arguments that serve only to polarise the field
of UFOlogy into two opposing camps, 'debunkers' and 'believers', thus
ensuring that little or no real debate ever takes place.
That is so demonstrably false it is hard to know where to start.
First off, it is the debunkers camp, the "Science by
Proclamation" crowd that you adhere to, which pushes
the debunkers and believers dichotomy. It is always
the debunkers who have snap answers to everything,
thus that alone limits the debate: hedge hogs, swamp
gas and super-duper top-secret time-compressed
weather balloons. I mean really!?!?!
As for your own credentials, you have never posted any of this 'real
research' you claim to have done, or pointed to any publications where we
might find examples of it; instead you just continually cross-post and
re-post the same tired old articles that you've stolen from other people,
Same tired old articles, who long have you been here?
The material never gets out of date, in fact it becomes
more important. Is your assignment, like Borsch-Belt,
to read every post??
most of which have recently been completely off topic. In place of logical
discussion you rely on childish insults, ad hominem attacks and your fatuous
lists of 'spOOks'.
The only thing is those ARE real spOOks:
O-BORG, Borsch, Echelon and Adams;
most likely Weller also!!
Furthermore, your self-assumed appellation of the
honourific 'Sir' is both inappropriate and offensive.
I obviously disagree.
If anyone round here is displaying classic 'spOOk' behaviour it's you.
Yadda-yadda, same ol' same ol'. Kettle black.
You'd
better call your 'handler', Agent Kolnick; your cover's been blown.
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, Bob!!
They all have done it, to my honor, I guess!!
--
Cliff Smith
If you haven't gotten the idea that this world is run by a criminal
elite lacking the slightest concern for the welfare of mankind,
then you haven't been paying attention. --Jim Keith RIP