| Subject: Re: Larry King: (Note) NO Roswell Witnesses - NONE! EVER! |
| From: nyceddie@webtv.net (E. L.) |
| Date: 03/07/2003, 20:55 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo |
Re: Larry King: (Note) NO Roswell Witnesses - NONE!
Group: alt.alien.visitors
Date: Thu, Jul 3, 2003, 4:22am (EDT+4) From: abuse@spam.com
(Bruce Hutchinson)
Furiously scratching in the sand, rdelephant@aol.com (RDElephant) wrote:
E.L. wrote
"Roswell has been discussed ad
infinitum and every day the witness count increases."
You say that like its a bad thing.
When a majority of the Friedman and Randle/Schmitt versions of the Saga
are tossed out because the prime witnesses all turned out to be liars,
then yeah- I'd say that is a "bad thing".
el: Cont'd "Go back to the original sources, the newspaper articles that
specify what "Mac" Brazel found and how sorry he was that he found the
remants of an obvious balloon train containing spying "technology."
Sorry Ed- Brazel never mentioned "spying technology",
el: "I didn't say he did. I put quote marks on technology because it
wasn't sophisticated technology. It was real basic. And to separate it
from weather technology, which was also in its infancy. But thanks
anyway. And to me the infant spying technology that was used is an
acceptable explanation than a crashed saucer."