<pstowe@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:be312c$drh$1@slb1.atl.mindspring.net...

In article <be2vug$82g$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net>,
"Harold Ensle" <hensle@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

"grandwazoo" <grand@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:3F016229.3080701@nospam.com...

To be sure, the stealth aspects need some improvements (duh!). They
screwed up and took measures to confuse the story. Two hours later the
military were dropping flares in a V configuration that matched the
leading edge geometry. The persons responsible then prevailed upon the
Governor of Arizona to help in that effort (the alien costume

incident),

to allay fears (that is why the general of the AZ Nat.Guard was at the
news conference) and that farce throws cold water on the fire of the
responsible inquiries. Now, the Phoenix incident is the grist of the

UFO

mill. (As a result, I have an insite into the effectiveness of how
counter-measures camouflage reality..)

Thanks for the excellent insights into this strange case.

However, I cannot buy that a craft of that size..flying silently by
propulsion of completely unknown origin, could be a human invention.

Because we do not even have the background physics to support such a
technology. So not only would the technology be secret, but so would
a very radically different physics be secret.

 Might I suggest...

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0767906276/104-5770954-5421507
?vi=glance

 Yes, there is "very radically different physics being kept secret"

 Paul Stowe

Thanks for the info.

Though maybe you do not realize how bankrupt modern physics
has become (though I would think you knew this). We have a
whole generation of physicists who think that the theory of
relativity is a completely logical and rational theory, instead of
the insane drivel that it really is. Do you really think that any
of these so-called physicists are bright enough to solve the
problem of gravity? I mean, they can't even recognize a few
simple little contradictions.

H.Ellis Ensle