| Subject: Re: Naked skepticism or why debunkers are ALWAYS demonstrably wrong!! |
| From: David Patrick |
| Date: 08/07/2003, 22:34 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.alien.research,alt.paranet.ufo,alt.paranet.abduct,sci.skeptic |
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 21:27:17 GMT, "Garry Bryan" <garrybry@pacbell.net>
wrote:
"David Patrick" <david.patrickNO+SPAM@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:r20lgvg3dtkh3tijbnkcv1u0dcvaqb3hch@4ax.com...
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 01:06:54 GMT, Sir Arthur C. B. E. Wholeflaffers
A.S.A. <nospam@newsranger.com> wrote:
D. Patrick who
refuses to address the evidence,
Okay then. Which case do you want to discuss? In your own words of
course. You wouldn't accept a cut-n-paste from me, now would you?
But how can he provide sources and evidence without doing that?
Well, from his extensive files of personal researc-- oh wait, yeah, I
forgot this was Flaffer we were talking about.
David Patrick