Subject: Re: More naked skepticism
From: Pete Charest
Date: 12/07/2003, 13:29
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.rec.ufo

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 10:19:55 GMT, "Kavik Kang"
<Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote:


Yes, like I said, being a reasonable person I am not going to assume that I
am correct. But it does appear too me after looking at it again here that
you are the one that is mistaken.



Marc Michalik (A.K.A. "The Rational Proponant", "The Teflon Believer", The
one and only Great Wall Debunker)

Listen up, KookyKavik, if you were rational you'd know how to spell
proponent.

And you'd know the difference between to and too. You evidently don't,
since you've misused them many times in your stupid posts.

You're a fucking kook, nothing more.

Have a nice day, dipshit.

Pete Charest
Insult Yourself, I'm Busy