"Michael Davis" <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:082ac3041cd5031653ff7fb2f6cef875@news.meganetnews.com...
Kavik Kang wrote:
You are really going to make me explain the obvious at length, aren't
you.
Ok... this tactic doesn't work long,
Since when is reality a "tactic?" Man, you are really starting to
sound like one crazy, old, kook.
What reality? The reality that you needed this simple point, that everyone
else understood, explained too you at length. Either you are stupid or you
were intentionally stalling that point as long as you could hold out on it.
A common tactic among raving lunatic debunkers.
once you realize I am always willing to
take the time to give a 2 paragraph answer to a 3 word answer question.
Here
goes, Bucko...
Correction: A *long winded*, crazy, old, kook.
Only because you made it necessary.
"The galaxy is big. It's really big. I mean, you think it big, but it's
even
bigger than that." Oops, that's Hitchiker's Guide, haha.
What were you saying about tactics? The #1 kook tactic is to cite
science fiction sources. You just joined the likes of Harold Ensle
who thinks "Forbidden Planet" was a documentary, and Ray "Crop
Circle" Richey who thinks "Mr. Spock" was a real person and cites
him often.
Whadda bunch of silly retards you are.
Haha, it was obviously a joke, haha. Everyone got it but you... Maybe it
wasn't a tactic, maybe you are just stupid. It wasn't "citing" anything, it
was a joke prior to saying what I meant too say. That was blatantly obvious.
Obviously, as
anyone who wasn't playing games would know by now, I am saying that two
stars seperated by 90 light years in this galaxy are close too each
other on
that galactic scale.
Which is irrelevant. On the human scale it is still just as
impossibly far away. Like I said before, picking and choosing your
yardstick doesn't make the star any closer.
Are you a complete moron? Everyone reading this understand but you, and I
have explained the tactic that you are using, and still using here with this
response. Stalling the point as long as you can, either that or you really
are this stupid. Either way, since you are the only person who does not
understand (you do, but let's assume that you don't), we are done with this
point as it has been made to the satisfaction of anyone who can read
English.
Everyone reading this except you understands this
already, but let's make sure you finally have it. In this vast area, 90
light years is a tiny little dash, a speck really.
Well then "dash" yourself over there, take a good look around, and
then come back and give us a report. We'll wait.
There is no need, since it is totally irrelivant too the point.
--- Flush tons and tons of meaningless, whiny drivel ---
Hey, Kang. I thought you said you'd only spew on for 2 paragraphs
to answer a simple question? Looks like you lied.
Actually it was exactly two paragraphs too that one question. There were
other responses after that too other things that you said. Try to keep up.
Repeating what?
Do you suffer from Alzheimer's or something?
No, myself and anyone else following along understands how confused,
probably intentionally, you are here.
That was the first time I clipped that and showed it too
you. It's what we have been discussing all along. And no, I haven't, I
am
here in this newsgroup, I'm not following every news outlet and keeping
up
with every scientific jounral
No wonder you are so full of silly notions.
What silly notions are those? Can you list even one?
as your kind likes to constantly demand.
Apparently you believe you have told me something that you have never
told
me, all you've done is rant and rave like a lunatic so far, and pick
minor
issues too turn into major ones.
The devil is in the details. If you can't even get the details
right, then why should anyone expect you to be correct about the
important stuff?
Babble, babble, babble. More meaningless noise that has nothing too do with
anything. You are the one who is so wrong about so many details of this
conversation, probably intentionally, but it doesn't matter. Anyone can
always trace back and see how this got too this point:-)
Nothing new, really. And my credibility is
a little bit more well-established around here than you imagine...
You are the one doing the imagining, kook. You have no credibility.
No???
I
certainly don't have to worry about an aggressive, abusive, name calling
Raving Lunatic
Hey, let's leave Roberta out of this.
That makes sense...
like you damaging it.
Is it possible to damage that which does not exist?
Keep telling yourself that, and running away:-)
--- Flush remainder of clueless idiocy and empty bluster ---
You mean clip almost everything I wrote because you had no response.
No, I clipped it because it was not *worthy* of a response from
me. HTH.
No, it was clipped because you had no response. It's all there for anyone
too see:-)
Here's another hint son, you won't get far in the world by denying
that the largest man-made object on Earth exists. Buy, rent,
borrow or steal a clue.
I deny nothing,
Further denial noted.
Further denial of what? Be specific... [I must answer for him here, because
he would not answer honestly, denial of the great wall. Makes little sense
in context, I know.]
in fact, there is nobody with a more sincere desire to find
evidence for that wall.
Maybe we could all chip in and take up a collection to send you to
China (one-way of course).
I would love to go too China! It looks like a wonderful country! But I'm
sure I wouldn't find any sign of your silly wall anywhere if I went there.
If it were there, there would be some evidence of that fact, and none has
yet been provided.
But there hasn't been any so far.
No evidence for the Great Wall showing up in the UFO NGs? Wow,
imagine that. But then UFO kooks are known for not having any
evidence whatsoever about anything.
Oh no, my demented little friend. Many raving lunatics far more intelligent,
articulate, and experienced than you have attempted to provide evidence,
none have succeeded. And Wallies are just as well known for not having any
evidence whatsoever about anything. So far you haven't even tried to present
any evidence for that wacky wall.
You, apparently,
take it's existance on faith.
Yeah, the same way I have "faith" in gravity.
Really, so you feel such an emotiobal attachement to this alledged wall of
yours that you believe that you can actually feel it's physical effects upon
you? Wow! That's a new one, nobody has ever made that claim before. You
could be the key too this whole mystery!!! Then again, you might just be
the biggest Wallie kook ever. One of the other, haha.
There can be no other explination, since you
insist it exsists and yet are unwilling to provide any evidence for that
extraordinary claim.
A wall is not an extraordinary claim. The planet is covered with
walls. Show me even one extraterrestrial. Thanks in advance.
A 2,000 mile long wall, built over a mountain range, by primitive people...
too keep out evil spirits. If that isn't an extraordinary claim, I don't
know what is. I don't think you'll find anyone to support your position that
there must be an extra-terrestrial aspect to a claim for it too be
extraordinary, although it is interesting that you would attempt to say that
it does.
Keep running, Bucko.
Running circles around kooks like you.
Running away at top speed, as is obvious to everyone.