Subject: Re: Naked skepticism or why debunkers are ALWAYS clothed!
From: "Kavik Kang" <Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com>
Date: 14/07/2003, 11:05
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic

"Pete Charest" <BigDog@SharpTeeth.com> wrote in message
news:12f3hv0abd3ldnscplfv64q6q3dbj4q339@4ax.com...
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003 11:58:07 GMT, "Kavik Kang"
<Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote:


Yes, I didn't really mean that the way it sounded.

Listen up, Kaptain Kangaroo. You are a stupid dumbass. Nobody cares if
you are a Zulu or a Hoodoo. That doesn't change the fact that you are
a crackpot and gullible buffoon.

Really? Where have I said anything that would lead any sane, rational person
too that conclusion? All you have done so far is hurl insults and try to
string together as many insulting phrases as possible in as short a space as
you can fit it. You seem too be the crackpot, on top of being a demented
lunatic with a sick need to attack people.

Gullible??? I'm not the moron senselessly atttacking someone who has shown
up out of the blue, has obviously been here before, and appears to be
intentionally trying to draw fire from the worst of the raving lunatics like
you. So far you are doing all the work for me, just ranting and raving like
a lunatic without ever saying anything of substance. Which one of us is
gullible?