Subject: Re: More naked skepticism
From: "Kavik Kang" <Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com>
Date: 15/07/2003, 11:26
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.rec.ufo,alt.usenet.kooks

"CIAspook" <ciaspook@charter.net> wrote in message
news:vh5ur3b8gl0i37@corp.supernews.com...
Then I have one more question:  Where you stated
". . ."debunker". They are talking
about the raving lunatics who attack anything
anyone says, insult people as
often as possible, and use any dishonest trick
they can think of too come
out on top of the conversation. . .".  Can you
point out one specific instance where a "debunker"
used these tactics on this NG?  No fair using
rhetoric or "I said".  Google might be a good
starting point.  I would like to see this where a
non-idiotic statement was admonished with your
above statement.  If a person makes an idiotic
statement that is meant to be a FACT then I think
that he/she should get what ever is coming to
them.

That's actually a silly question. It happens all the time, you have to know
what I am talking about. However, just search on the name "Dean Adams" and
you won't have to read long to find plenty of examples. Or how about this
Pete Charest guy over in the other thread? I haven't really even mentioned
UFOs, or any subject that might be considered "kooky", and he just began
screaming and yelling at me out of the blue mearly because he detected a
hint of proponent tone in my writing. That's actually a great example:-)