"Kavik Kang" <Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:KFQQa.67965$Ph3.7016@sccrnsc04...

"CIAspook" <ciaspook@charter.net> wrote in

message

news:vh5ur3b8gl0i37@corp.supernews.com...

Then I have one more question:  Where you

stated

". . ."debunker". They are talking
about the raving lunatics who attack anything
anyone says, insult people as
often as possible, and use any dishonest trick
they can think of too come
out on top of the conversation. . .".  Can you
point out one specific instance where a

"debunker"

used these tactics on this NG?  No fair using
rhetoric or "I said".  Google might be a good
starting point.  I would like to see this

where a

non-idiotic statement was admonished with your
above statement.  If a person makes an idiotic
statement that is meant to be a FACT then I

think

that he/she should get what ever is coming to
them.

That's actually a silly question. It happens all

the time, you have to know

what I am talking about.

If it happens all of the time, why can't you post
an example?

However, just search on the name "Dean Adams" and
you won't have to read long to find plenty of

examples.

Dean Adams has not posted here in years.

Or how about this Pete Charest guy over in the

other thread?

I haven't really even mentioned
UFOs, or any subject that might be considered

"kooky", and he just began

screaming and yelling at me out of the blue

mearly because he detected a

hint of proponent tone in my writing. That's

actually a great example:-)

That is not a good example.  Charest is not a
debunker he is an agitator

I wonder why you cannot point out a specific
instance of "raving lunatics who attack anything
anyone says, insult people as often as possible,
and use any dishonest trick they can think of too
come out on top of the
conversation" that has been used on this NG.

As I suspected you seem to have a predgidice
against anyone that displays doubt about your
posts.  Calling folks that hate bunk names is no
better than your so called "debunkers" calling you
kook names.  You seem to have a superiority
complex when it comes to posting here.  What you
have shown is that you have no more information
about anything than the next person.  I hate it
when someone posts (Wholeflaffer) utter crap as
facts.  I find that most "kooks" expect everyone
to take their posts as gospel.  Sorry I am a
skeptic and this old skeptic hates bunk.  I will
continue to debunk the "kooks" until the day I can
no longer see my keyboard.

The Real Spook