| Subject: Re: Naked skepticism or why debunkers are ALWAYS clothed! |
| From: "Kavik Kang" <Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> |
| Date: 15/07/2003, 11:23 |
| Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic |
"Pete Charest" <BigDog@SharpTeeth.com> wrote in message
news:eia5hv4qpvo29nh7kl7t4vufu5ep7df6nl@4ax.com...
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:05:25 GMT, "Kavik Kang"
<Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I didn't really mean that the way it sounded.
Listen up, Kaptain Kangaroo. You are a stupid dumbass. Nobody cares if
you are a Zulu or a Hoodoo. That doesn't change the fact that you are
a crackpot and gullible buffoon.
Really? Where have I said anything that would lead any sane, rational
person
too that conclusion?
Everything you say leads to that conclusion, Kaptain Kangaroo.
Really? Can you point out even one example? Any normal person reading this
conversation could only conclude that you are a nutcase. You've done nothing
but string together insults and try to label me a "kook" even though I have
said or done nothing to even think about such a label. You, on the other
hand, have acted very much like a kook. You are really starting too look
silly and I would just give up if I were you.
All you have done so far is hurl insults and try to
string together as many insulting phrases as possible in as short a space
as
you can fit it. You seem too be the crackpot, on top of being a demented
lunatic with a sick need to attack people.
Nope...I don't attack people at all. I only attack crackpots with
gullible and profoundly stupid shit coming out of their mouths, like
you.
All you have done is attack me, and for no reason at all, out of the blue. I
have said nothing "gullible" or "crackpot" at all. Anyone can read back in
this thread and see how you just began attempting too attack me and
discredit me, for no apparent reason, since I wasn't talking too you and
have never even seen you before. Please point out just one thing that I have
said that would qualify as "gullible and profoundly stupid shit". You can't,
because I haven't. You will never succeed in labeling me a kook.
Gullible??? I'm not the moron senselessly atttacking someone who has
shown
up out of the blue, has obviously been here before, and appears to be
intentionally trying to draw fire from the worst of the raving lunatics
like
you.
That's your problem, not mine, isn't it, Kaptain Kangaroo.
No, your gullibility in attacking me is plainly obvious for anyone too see.
I'm obviously here to attract raving lunatics like you, and give them a
taste of their own medicne and you came right too me, just screaming and
yelling for no apparent reason. You are a real nutcase, and the more you
keep swearing at me and trying to label me with absolutely no cause, the
more you look like a nutcase. You have yet to say anything of substance, you
have yet to even mention any subject other than me. You are a textbook
example of a Raving Lunatic Debunker, thanks, creating examples like you is
the whole reason I'm here. Who's gullible? Do you know what that word means?
You really should consider an easier target for your warped little game, I'm
a lot better at it than you are.
a lunatic without ever saying anything of substance. Which one of us is
gullible?
You are.
"I know you are but what am I..." Do you have any idea how foolish you
look...
...I bet you're sick enough to actually reply again. I would say dumb
enough, but I consider cases as bad as yours to be, honestly, potentially a
real psychological disorder, so it's possible that you actually have a need
to reply again, making it inevitable:-(