Subject: Re: Naked skepticism or why debunkers are ALWAYS clothed!
From: Pete Charest
Date: 15/07/2003, 14:09
Newsgroups: alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:23:08 GMT, "Kavik Kang"
<Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote:

Really? Can you point out even one example? Any normal person reading this
conversation could only conclude that you are a nutcase. You've done nothing
but string together insults and try to label me a "kook" even though I have
said or done nothing to even think about such a label. 

Your own TwonkyEsque definition of *debunker* is a perfect example of
your crackpottery and kookiness.

You can't change the definitions of words to suit your own bullshit
agenda, dipshit. That's one of the signs of dementia, you know.

The label *nutcase* suits you perfectly, you Kooky Kangarooster.

ou, on the other
hand, have acted very much like a kook. You are really starting too look
silly and I would just give up if I were you.

Request denied. I don't follow suggestions of lunatics.


Pete Charest
Insult Yourself, I'm Busy