Subject: Re: More naked skepticism
From: Garry Bryan
Date: 16/07/2003, 18:01
Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.paranet.ufo,uk.rec.ufo,alt.usenet.kooks

In alt.alien.visitors Michael Davis <mdavis19@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
: Kavik Kang wrote:

: Tons and tons of absolute bullshit. Damn, you are one long-winded 
: mofo, Krank. Let's try to weed through this massive pile of 
: excrement, discard all the the BS and see if there is anything 
: actually worth responding to in it.

: Snip Kang missing the point.

Which you often do. . .

: Snip Kang claiming to speak for everyone.

Which you often do. . .

: Snip Kang whining about people who haven't posted in years.

Hmmm. . .

: Snip Kang claiming to speak for everyone.

Which you often do. . .

: Snip Kang in denial about his kook status.

You are in denial of your obsessive status. . .

: Snip Kang claiming to speak for everyone.

Which you often do. . .

: Snip Kang playing to an imaginary audience.

Which you often do. . .

: Snip Kang claiming to speak for everyone.

Which you often do. . .

: Snip Kang whining about people in other threads.

Which you often do. . .

: Snip Kang claiming to speak for everyone.

Which you often do. . .

: Snip Kang proudly proclaiming to be off topic

Hmmmm. . .

: Snip Kang claiming to speak for everyone.

Which you often do. . .

: Snip Kang repeating his earlier stupidity.

Which you often do. .. 

: Snip Kang claiming to speak for everyone.

Which you often do. . .

: Snip Kang's Great Wall lunacy.

You should try it some time. . .

: Hmmmmmmmm, not much left. Basically it all just boils down to a 
: bunch of incoherent raging against debunkers.

As oppossed to your incoherent raving against "FTBs". . .

: Look here, Kang. I've told you before that raging against 
: debunkers is a sure sign of kookery. People with something real to 
: back up their stories don't have problems with debunkers. 
: Debunkers don't seem to impede the relentless march of science and 
: technology. New discoveries and unusual phenomena backed up with 
: hard evidence are taken in stride by debunkers. Only people out on 
: the lunatic fringe, with no evidence and only faith or fantasies 
: or fraud to back up their claims fear and rage against debunkers.

So trying to substantiate your position again?

: So guess what that makes you?

:> Are we having fun yet?

: You betcha!

A barrel of laughs, you are. . .

Garry