"Pete Charest" <BigDog@SharpTeeth.com> wrote in message
news:30v7hvcntejbjjtltqbhmj9qdtff5mn1r8@4ax.com...

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:23:08 GMT, "Kavik Kang"
<Kavik_Kang@hotmail.com> wrote:

Really? Can you point out even one example? Any normal person reading

this

conversation could only conclude that you are a nutcase. You've done

nothing

but string together insults and try to label me a "kook" even though I

have

said or done nothing to even think about such a label.

Your own TwonkyEsque definition of *debunker* is a perfect example of
your crackpottery and kookiness.

It's not my definition, it is the most commonly held definition of that term
within the UFO debate.

You can't change the definitions of words to suit your own bullshit
agenda, dipshit. That's one of the signs of dementia, you know.

I didn't, it's what most people mean by "debunker" in discussions involving
UFOs. Generally, only the debunkers themselves attempt to deny this obvious
fact.

The label *nutcase* suits you perfectly, you Kooky Kangarooster.

ou, on the other
hand, have acted very much like a kook. You are really starting too look
silly and I would just give up if I were you.

Request denied. I don't follow suggestions of lunatics.

No, request denied because, as anyone following my posts is well aware, I
have not said anything "kooky" and therefore it is not possible for you to
fulfill my request that you back up your insane ranting and babbling in
attempting to label me a "kook" and thus fulfill your demented need to feel
superior too me.

You got through a whole post without swearing once, that's a major
accomplishment for you. It's like your IQ shot up 20 points or something,
you're almost retarded now.